Homecoming Aerosol Art
None Dare Call It Graffiti
Saturday, October 17, 2009
It would be an understatement to say homecoming celebrations are, as a rule, mindless fun. This can be a great relief. However, it wasn’t entirely true of this year’s dance.
In preparation, Santa Barbara High School held an aerosol art (a.k.a. graffiti) competition on Tuesday, October 6, in which students decorated plywood boards to display at the event. The idea came from the theme of the dance, “City Lights.” The Associated Student Body (ASB) needed a design element. This was an easy solution and a way to use student art. The homecoming officers also had the goal of bringing everyone together.
Maren Schiffer
Camille Phillips, ASB treasurer, said of the process, “Our initial reasoning behind having [the competition] was to fill an empty hallway with decorations. As we continued preparations, though, our motives changed to include bringing the school together in a new and unique way.” It seems all of the officers shared a heretofore unspoken motivation to involve the entire school this time around. The idea of graffiti art attracts almost any young adult: It is urban, rebellious, and often aesthetically interesting. It was a way to mesh different ethnicities and personality types together.
The name aerosol art, versus graffiti art, was pitched because of the controversy “graffiti” holds. The administration could not advocate an act that violates school property daily; countless walls have been graffitied, painted over, and graffitied again.. But can it advocate the art form itself? Yes, because in this case the intentions and results were only positive. Of course, one could argue that without rebellion the art form loses much of its raw substance, that part of its charm is the dare-devil act.
That is why the competition was so amazing: The art didn’t lose its charm. It was endearing in different ways, like the way it united diverse students, brought a creative edge to a traditional celebration, and promoted the dance so that more students came. Just by looking at the competition’s crowd I could see that the idea would fulfill its purpose. Interest, talent, diversity, and genuine enjoyment were all present. A controversial element turned out, simply stated, to be a success.
Related Links
Comments
I don't understand why they would use this as the Homecoming theme? Where they just out of ideas?
Maybe they should have held a contest beforehand and let the students submit ideas. Anything would have been better than this. Looks like Homecoming in the East LA- lovely.
ZG (anonymous profile)
October 17, 2009 at 12:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Nice article; thanks for sharing Maren.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Note to ZG --
your prejudices are showing.
Unless you actually saw the decorations, your comment reveals more of your fears and bias than a fair-minded evaluation of the decor.
Certainly seeing the one picture accompanying the article it would be impossible to provide any thoughtful assessment.
And your reading skills are also remedial; SBHS did hold a open contest before the dance.
binky (anonymous profile)
October 17, 2009 at 1:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I would strongly disagree ZG. It was a great idea. If you had seen the set up your opinion would most likely be different. Also at this homecoming dance, there was around 1200 tickets sold, compared to the usual 700-900. It was classier than East LA
MaggieSBlover (anonymous profile)
October 17, 2009 at 1:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
ZG (anonymous profile)
October 17, 2009 at 1:28 p.m.
Yes, while forbidden fruit is the sweetest, I doubt for some of these artist its like that. They would just like to be able to put their work up and that its recognized like most other artist do. Not everybody likes "the man" on their behind. Too bad this town has gotten too artsy-fartsy to allow murals, I'm sure we could get a good look at some local talent out there.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
October 17, 2009 at 2:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I would have loved an event like that when I was in high school!
madeinsb (anonymous profile)
October 25, 2009 at 9:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)