Paul Wellman
Families ACT! press conference
Treatment, Not Felonies
Advocates Demand Better Services for Those with Addictions and Mental Disorders
Wednesday, August 18, 2010
In response to the rash of heroin overdoses last week, and hoping to generate public awareness for their cause, a group of advocates gathered outside the Santa Barbara Courthouse yesterday to talk about the troubles faced by area residents who suffer both mental health issues and drug addictions.
Sponsored by Families ACT!, a grassroots organization formed in 2007 to address what it feels are policies that lead to the unnecessary and oftentimes cyclical incarceration of people with co-occurring disorders, the event kicked off a series of forums, teach-ins, and press conferences scheduled for the coming months. The efforts will culminate, organizers said, in the November election when Measure S (the local jail tax measure) and Proposition 19 (the Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010) hit the ballot.
Paul Wellman
Suzanne Riordan
Families ACT! founder and director Suzanne Riordan said the system of locking up Santa Barbara residents for drug offenses “has got to change,” explaining that stays in residential treatment facilities, compared to jail or prison stints, are much more effective in changing lives for the better. She also said the criminal justice system makes it so that residents who are struggling with addiction and mental disorders are reticent to seek help in the right ways. “We want to bring this whole issue of drug use and drug overdose out from the shadows, out from under the veil of stigma, shame, guilt, and grief,” she said.
Riordan praised the recent actions of a group of people who dropped off one of their overdosing friends at Cottage Hospital last week, saying they were brave to face arrest in the pursuit of medical help. She said such actions are rare, and the stigma of drug use oftentimes makes people act out of desperation. Her own son, she explained, overdosed in 2005 as he was taking drugs with a group of men. On probation, he was facing jail time because of a relapse. Instead of calling paramedics, the men wrapped his body in a white sheet and hid him under a nearby building. His body wasn’t discovered for three weeks.
Riordan said hundreds of families were asked to participate in the press conference in order to speak up about the need for more residential treatment beds — of which there are almost none in the county — but were too afraid to attend. “Drug use is not a crime, it’s a mental health issue,” she said. “We’ve got to turn this around.” She implored that the money going toward the construction of jails and prisons should instead be funneled into the implementation of treatment programs, explaining after the conference that she and her group are torn when it comes to Measure S. While the half-cent sales tax would be used mainly to pay for a new North County jail, she explained, 16 percent of the revenue generated — $5 million — would go toward preventing recidivism.
By Paul Wellman
Families ACT! press conference
She also explained that while Families ACT! unofficially agrees with some of the arguments behind Prop. 19, it’s not because she or others “like pot. I don’t like any drugs,” she said. But, the decriminalization of small amounts of illegal drugs will keep people out of jail who have no business being there, she stated. “If we don’t begin to change our drug laws, this [problem] will never go away,” Riordan said.
City Councilmember Grant House spoke next, echoing the message that services for those with co-occurring disorders are simply not adequate and that Santa Barbara — like many other communities throughout the country — is facing “a very serious problem” with drug abuse. He said there is a definite need for a residential treatment facility, and the community needs to come to terms with that fact. “We need to get people out of the revolving door of incarceration,” he said, emphasizing Tuesday’s event was meant to spur a discussion of strategies and give a voice to those in need.
Paul Wellman
Gordy Coburn
Gordy Coburn, chair of the S.B. City College Alcohol and Drug Counseling Department, said while some treatment options are available to area residents, they’re not enough. People, he explained, are consistently self-medicating with the “wrong drug” and lead lives of dependency that sometimes end in premature death. Coburn said 85 percent of those behind bars are there for drug offenses, even though 75 percent of jails and prisons are overcrowded. Additionally, he went on, it costs the state around $45,000 per year to house an inmate but only $10,000 a year to treat someone with co-occurring disorders.
Claiming proper treatment would cut down not only on the number of drug-related deaths countywide, but also probably reduce the number of homeless who wander the streets, Coburn said the treatment programs are out there, they just have to be implemented. “We know how to do this,” he said. “Let’s do it.”
Janice Shea, Hotel de Riviera program director, said we as a community need to “take responsibility for what’s happening around us,” and said those in need are not strangers or vagabonds, but “are our brothers, sisters, fathers, and mothers. They’re ours. These are members of our society that deserve our respect and our dollars,” she said.
Jean Lott of Lompoc, whose son suffers from co-occurring disorders, closed things out by stating, “We want treatment, not felonies.” Riordan also said the Sheriff’s Coroner’s Bureau — which she claimed admitted weaknesses in its data collection processes — is working to update its systems to better reflect the frequency and details of alcohol and drug-related deaths.
Families ACT! has not, and will not, take an official position on Prop. 19. The article has been amended to reflect that.
Comments
“We want treatment, not felonies.”
At whose expense?
Let's compromise here. A large number of people feel that drug use is a legitimate life style choice like alcohol or nicotine. I might buy that - but then don't stick me (the taxpayer) with the bill when someone can't handle it.
ramey (anonymous profile)
August 18, 2010 at 2:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Let me answer that, although it's addressed in the above article: To me you ask the wrong question. Try "What's in it for me? Answer: YOUR personal fourfold (at least) tax savings, to wit: "It costs over $42K to house an inmate (criminalized for substance abuse) per year, but only $10K a year to treat them in the community." And what do you suppose it costs the community when young, untreated "felons" walk out of prison forever stigmatized, stranded and without coping skills? What are their chances of getting a job? Finding new clean and healthy friends? Getting out of the morass that got them using in the first place? Becoming a real contribution to society? What are their chances of repeating this insane cycle at an ever-higher "criminal" bar?
We as a society need to stop "blaming the victims" of our own shortsightedness and lost values. It takes a whole village to raise a child. Being humane is always the best AND cheapest answer. IF we help people instead of criminalizing what is a personal mental health issue, Santa Barbarans can truly aspire to live much freer and richer together in Paradise.
sbs (anonymous profile)
August 18, 2010 at 5:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What sbs said. Treatment, not jail, can break the cycle.
fredb93117 (anonymous profile)
August 19, 2010 at 5:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks for this piece! and @sbs..Thank you!
The more light put on this reality the more "mainstream" this strategy will become. You have to break the cycle in order to put a "cure" next to the problem.
About 12 years ago....
A group of people wrapped their arms around me and gave me strength and hope...I might of died...my baby might have been in the system...or worse.
I was a drunk solo Mommy with a baby...It can be so cold out there when you are lost.
because of these people... and about $3 a day ( I should write a book called.."Get Sober For Less Than $5 A Day...sorry...the $28 Grand a month "spin dries...leave me wanting)
Anyhow..because of this group of "surivors" I am now ...not only a good Mom and Stepmom...but...a writer/producer/actor/director...and advocate for treatment of all kinds...For "duals"... Mental Health and addiction are so close..and then there are other "duals"...brain injury victims....victims of trauma or extreme life change...soldiers...Dr's...add infinitum
We are the world and the world is us! Thanks again
Lizzy
http://www.independent.com/weblogs/so...
emenzies (Elizabeth Menzies)
August 19, 2010 at 7:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)
As good as treatment sounds, it is too difficult to give it through state run programs. If somebody needs help it should be available BEFORE they rob their family of all valuables and burn their mother in their sleep. I have always found the way we operate kind of backwards; if you haven't gotten into trouble there is no help, it is only offered once you are in the system. What our system tells us is that you will only get help if you break the law.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
August 19, 2010 at 5:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
If you don't want your tax dollars to fund social programs, fair enough. Please encourage the private sector to provide more funding to social programs. Perhaps some of the "record" bonuses Goldman-Sachs has been paying its employees could have instead been reinvested in community programs. Social programs do not need to be funded by more taxes and they don't need to be run by the government.
When will the private sector step up and succeed in areas where the government is failing?
Kingprawn (anonymous profile)
August 20, 2010 at 11:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The best solution is to remove drugs from the public. Drug test everyone over the age of ? 14 ? and set appropriate punishments.
Drug Addiction Final Fact 6:
Sadly, nearly two-thirds of people in drug abuse treatment report that they were physically or sexually abused as children. Child abuse is a major contributing factor to drug addiction.
Drug testing does work in the military, in sports (it's adding this to sports records *, the little asterisk). It scares new employees straight for a few months after college. Anywhere it's used, it works.
In the meantime, before drug testing everyone kicks in, addicts need help and I'm all for treatment, both with their addictions and treatment for likely historic child abuse that drove them to drug addiction.
khiggler (anonymous profile)
August 20, 2010 at 6:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Universal treatment? Sounds like, gasp---socialism!
Treatment is NOT a panacea. Treatment ONLY works for those who want it, Gordy knows this.
Bad chemicals when mixed with bad chemicals react in bad decisions and broken lives. And by the second "bad chemical" I mean biologically bad chemicals.
Not everyone is "fixable."
Most by choice; far too many by physiological circumstance.
Whatever the reason, it does appear that it is less costly to treat and provide appropriate services than it is to incarcerate.
Too often violence compounds the issue, then what? Treat and retain? Treat and release so that they might offend again?
ALL drugs should be legalized, regulated, taxed the hell out of, and dispensed to those who want them. I don't do them, but this ridiculous so-called "war" on drugs is as pathetic a losing enterprise as is the so-called "war on terror."
Might as well declare a friggin' "jihad on flatulent methane."
Draxor (anonymous profile)
August 22, 2010 at 2:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)
How is it a losing war? It provides plenty of job security to law enforcement and legal personnel.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
August 23, 2010 at 9:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)