The GATE’s Closing
It’s a Socioeconomic Thing
Saturday, February 20, 2010
In high school, there tend to be fine lines. Fine lines between a friend and a companion, for example, and fine lines between understanding something or not.
A certain issue has been at the surface of high school administration talk lately, and I know which side I stand on. The issue: The school board is debating whether or not the GATE program should be eliminated from secondary schools. This means, at Santa Barbara High School, that GATE classes would become unavailable to freshmen and sophomores, the only class levels where they are now offered. For juniors and seniors, AP (“accelerated placement”) classes fill the top-performing-students niche. The hope is that removing the GATE program will encourage integration in higher level classes.
I understand the issue well enough to hold a firm position, but unfortunately it’s harder for me to determine the solutions that eventually need to be in effect. So do I fully understand it or not?
Not including AP, there are four levels of classes in high school. From least to most advanced they are: combination classes for English learners, college prep, honors, and GATE. Students in GATE classes either passed the placement test in third or sixth grade, or they found a loophole through the system vis à vis recommendations, etc. One problem administrators have with this system is that students are being placed in GATE according to a test that they likely took place six years ago. Some in the GATE program may no longer be in the right place, and some who did not pass could now be qualified. Furthermore, in elementary school, many parents are not aware of the GATE program, so their children never take the test.
The proposal to eliminate GATE was presented to the Santa Barbara School District Board of Education February 2, its purpose being to increase ethnic and socioeconomic diversity in advanced classes. Maybe this doesn’t mean much to you. But you haven’t lived and breathed in a school for four years that is inexplicably uncomfortable. You spend every day in an environment that is seemingly segregated, yet most people try to ignore it, and no one knows how to change it. Your advanced classes are only 15% Latino.
So yes, I stand behind the removal of the GATE program in high schools. Without a doubt; you cannot even make me shift one foot. It is a first step at ending this strange division, though its effects will be far from dramatic.
If you are a GATE parent reading this, most likely you currently hold a look of horror on your face. If this is true, I beg you, before you lose your temper, please, please try to understand: Your concerns are trivial. Note that GATE is not weighted more than honors. GATE means nothing to colleges, so be assured its absence will not affect your child’s chance at getting into Princeton or Brown or UPenn. The removal of GATE will not detract from the rigor of classes. In fact, there are currently no GATE science programs at SBHS; I can attest that these honors classes were as challenging or more so for me than many GATE classes I have taken. This move will in no way weaken your child’s education.
GATE, and acronym for “Gifted and Talented Education,” is a name that automatically gives its members a feeling of superiority, leaving outsiders to wrongly feel that they are not “gifted” or “talented. Just as importantly, GATE’s presence gives our school four levels of classes instead of the more universal three—so a student in a college-prep class is burdened with the feeling that to move to AP, he or she must jump over two levels of classes. It sounds terrifying.
I previously mentioned that this is not a dramatic step. We will not be screaming hallelujah for a newly righteous education. The fact is that the issue of diverse socioeconomic representation in advanced classes needs to be approached at an earlier stage: elementary school. It is when the GATE program first starts, and when students need to build a foundation of confidence. It is when teachers need to begin pushing students to their full capacities.
What can we do? I previously mentioned that because I have no solutions to offer, I’m not sure that I fully understand the issue. So help me take it from here.
Related Links
Comments
So now that we've gotten rid of the GATE classes do we want to eliminate the honors classes also. After all, for the sake of diversity.....
Gordo (anonymous profile)
February 20, 2010 at 5:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The GATE program is a joke and no more than cover for paranoid white flight. Get rid of it, even down to the elementary level! Obviously, keeping honors and AP are a no brainer. Show some common sense people, please.
surfrmom (anonymous profile)
February 20, 2010 at 7:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I think it's important to remember we're not talking about dividing up smart and dumb kids to be put on dislplay. We're talking about allowing students to develop their strengths and weaknesses. A student could be in the highest level history class and the lowest level math class. Advanced classes benefit students gifted in an area, but slower paced classes benefit students who have trouble with a subject even more. Putting a student who is having trouble with math into a normal paced math class will essentially halt that students progress unless the teacher slows the pace of the class for all students. With the number of students in each class it's impossible to give each student enough individual attention no matter how great the teacher may be.
If it truly is about diversity there has to be a way to fix the entrance requirements to make sure that students are entered based on intelligence instead of background. Otherwise closing the program would be like throwing out the baby with the bathwater. California and the U.S. is not known for having the greatest primary education. Halting any attempt to provide slightly better education, even if it is to a smaller population is a mistake.
I know parents want to protect their children from believing that there are smarter students in more rigorous classes, but this is dishonest and it will become even more apparent to your child if all the students are in the same class. Some students are stronger in some subjects and benefit from more challenging courses, just like some students are stronger/faster than others and excel at sports. Hobbling students who are gifted in an area does not make the overall student population smarter, more motivated or more confident.
dc (anonymous profile)
February 22, 2010 at 10:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Can somebody please explain:
If GATE classes are eliminated for the first two years of high school, and for junior high school as a whole, what exactly is going to take their place?
On KEYT last night, representatives from the school district seemed to imply that changing 'GATE' to 'Honors' was mostly just a name change. But it doesn't seem like this is the whole story.
When I first heard this topic reported, the implication was that there were existing Honors classes that GATE was going to be merged with. But at least at Goleta Valley Jr. High and at DP, there are no current Honors classes.
So is this just a name change, or is it something else?
Clarification would be much appreciated.
eyerag (anonymous profile)
February 23, 2010 at 10:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Here's the proposal: All GATE classes would be renamed "Honors." For areas in which there are already "Honors" classes, the hardest class (usu. GATE) will be kept the same, just with a different name.
ddrichman (anonymous profile)
February 23, 2010 at 3:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I am a 9th grade student, and am in GATE. This year, I wanted to take a biology class, but they only had non-advanced ones for freshman to take, and I took it anyways. There was an immense difference in everything- the challenge of the class, the character of the students. The class was too easy, I had loved biology before, and during the class, I was bored out of my mind. Any time I offered a complex explanation, or corrected a student or the teacher, they just stared at me blankly. I did al the homework that was assigned, got A's on all the tests, and it seemed like I was the only one doing so. No one else took interest in the class but me. When we got to choose our seats in the class one day, I chose mine, in the back, isolated from the other students, so they wouldn't copy my homework or cheat of my tests like they had done many times before. When nothing academic was happening in the class- I was unimportant, invisible, the nerd. However, suddenly when a group project approached the class, everyone hurried to my table, and made me do the work by myself. In my GATE classes, everyone seemed to love school, helped each other out, and I was faced with a challenge every day. GATE has nothing to do with what race you are, or what you look like, it's about if you like school, like challenges, and want to excel. I have good memories from being in GATE, and I would not want anyone else to be deprived of ones like I had. Please, don't take away my education.
science_lover (anonymous profile)
March 3, 2010 at 5:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)
In response to science_lover. I never tested into GATE because I entered SB public schools after the test was issued in elementary school. Because I was not a 'GATE' student in jr. high and there was only a small number of honors classes in junior high - I suffered like you described, through not just one boring class but many. When I got to high school there were a lot more honors classes available and I could take GATE classes if I got teacher recommendation. I did well and was challenged and I actually learned something - mostly because I was in classes where other students wanted to learn and pay attention. There was an obvious pattern that the more challenging the class was, the more the students payed attention.
Does this mean we keep the GATE program?I don't think so. In fact, I say get rid of it all together in the jr. high and high school grades, add more challenging honors and AP classes and let any kid in who wants to learn. If you're not willing or able to do the work, then you won't take the class. Besides, colleges don't recognize the GATE label anyway. This isn't about making the classes easier or mixing smart kids with not-so-smart kids or giving the underprivileged kid a 'break'. It's about cleaning up the system, getting rid of the barriers, especially in jr. high, and offering more challenging classes for everyone. Isn't that what a public school education is supposed to be? Otherwise, if you're so hung up on a label, choke up the bucks and go to some elite private school.
Hello (anonymous profile)
March 11, 2010 at 9:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)