Assistant Santa Barbara Police Chief Frank Mannix publicly teed off on Detective Jaycee Hunter last Thursday, accusing Hunter — a spokesperson for the Police Officers Association— of “overstating the facts, understating the facts, and plain-old fashioned misstating the facts.” Mannix’s remarks came during a five-hour meeting of the Fire and Police Commission, where he sought to rebut Hunter’s contention — delivered in city council chambers a month ago — that crime rates were going up, arrests rates were going down, and officer response times were slowing down. At that time, Hunter unveiled reams of statistics he claimed showed the extent to which public safety has been compromised as the number of authorized sworn officers has shrunk from 152 to 137 over the past 10 years in the face of chronic budget woes. “Jaycee Hunter is a very good detective,” Mannix said, “but he’s no crime analyst.”
Before becoming an administrator, Mannix spent 10 years as an active member of the Police Officers Association (POA), negotiating five contracts for the union and heading the union’s influential political action committee. “I can’t support cherry-picking data to provide impressions of crime trends that do not exist,” he said after last week’s meeting. “I never did that when I was with the POA, and I don’t know what’s happened with the POA for that to happen now.” Mannix bombarded the Fire and Police commissioners with a blizzard of facts and figures of his own, all indicating that crime rates — in general — have gone down or held steady during the past 10 years, while arrests have gone up and response times have met or exceeded department goals. Furthermore, Mannix contended that it’s simply not possible to establish any link between crime rates and the number of police officers. “Major reductions in crime occurred in periods when we were losing significant staff,” he said.
Paul Wellman
CAUSE AND EFFECT: Detective Jaycee Hunter (left) and Sgt. Charles McChesney contend that crime has increased during the past 10 years as the department has reduced the number of authorized officers from 152 to 137 in response to chronic budget shortfalls, which, they maintain, were intentionally engineered by City Administrator Jim Armstrong to justify shrinking the department.
As a rule, cops are loathe to air their differences in public. But the POA’s contract has just expired and City Administrator Jim Armstrong — in response to a $9-million budget shortfall — has been pressuring all public employee unions to accept significant wage and benefit cuts. The budget approved by the city council three weeks ago is predicated upon the assumption that the unions representing police officers and firefighters agree to cuts worth $2 million. Without such concessions, Armstrong has said he’ll have to impose even deeper cuts on other city programs. The POA’s real beef is with Armstrong — who they contend is hiding millions of dollars in reserves that would obviate the need for any concessions — and not with Chief Cam Sanchez or Mannix. But with his presentation last month, Detective Hunter infuriated Sanchez by charging the police department itself was massaging its response-time numbers for serious crimes — arbitrarily excluding all response time over 30 minutes — to keep their averages artificially low. At the time, Sanchez fumed Hunter never aired his concerns within the department. Last week, Mannix lowered the boom.
According to Hunter, residential burglaries rose 133 percent between 2001 and 2009; DUI collisions, 200 percent; sexual assaults, 65 percent; and kidnapping, 300 percent. But according to Mannix, violent crime dropped to a 10-year low in 2009, down to 399 reported incidents. That compares to 470 in 2000 and a high of 641 in 2004. If currents trends continue, Mannix said, there will be 348 violent crimes reported in 2010. Mannix did concede there was “a bloom” in residential burglaries last year, but said the department has focused on that issue and appears to have made progress. (The spike in burglaries may be related to the massive anti-gang sweep known as Operation Gator Roll. In that, detectives working narcotics were re-assigned to the gang detail. While gang activity went down, the illegal drug trade went up, and residential burglaries increased with the ensuing addiction problems.)
In some instances, Mannix said Hunter’s numbers were just wrong — as in DUI collisions — but in others, they failed to account for changes in how the department tabulates crime. Since 2001, the police department has used three different computer programs keeping crime statistics. In that same time, the department’s policies for logging reported crimes has changed, as well. In 2008, for example, the department started counting as “sexual assaults” reports that previously had been filed in a separate category as “suspicious circumstance sexual assault.” These cases involve victims who may have been assaulted but, for a host of reasons, aren’t sure what happened or whom it happened with. Likewise, any time victims claim to have been held against their will, the department now logs that as a kidnapping. However these cases are categorized and labeled, Mannix said, the number of arrests is increasing. Last year, for example, the department reported 20,488 arrests compared to 18,548 in 2005 and 14,315 in 2001.
As for Hunter’s charge that the department massaged response-time numbers, Mannix said only one serious call was filtered out in the past six months, and that involved an injured bicyclist who lost control while driving over a speed bump. Police did not respond because the cyclist had been taken by ambulance to the hospital. Had that call not been filtered out, Mannix said, the department’s monthly response times would have been slower by a minute. In the previous year, 11 priority calls were similarly filtered.
Like beauty and pornography, the meaning of statistics lies in the eye of the beholder. Mayor Helene Schneider and Councilmember Harwood “Bendy” White were on hand for Mannix’s rebuttal, and both said they were impressed by the thoroughness and clarity of his work. Schneider and White will have a major say in what concessions, if any, city hall will insist on from the POA. More critically, they — as well as the entire council — will be on the hot seat if and when the council declares an impasse in negotiations. Should that occur, the council is empowered to impose a contract on the police union. The union, not legally allowed to strike, could respond by providing the bare minimum of legally required service and no more.
Former POA president Charles McChesney attended the meeting, as well, and said Mannix was unduly personal in his remarks and that Hunter’s concerns — however inflammatory he may have been in expressing them — remained valid. POA President Mike McGrew, who did not attend the meeting, conceded that violent crime is down from 20 years ago, but that the experience of officers in the street is getting decidedly nastier. “You can’t tell me that we are providing the same level of service to the people in this town with 137 cops as we did with 152,” he said. “That’s just not real.” Mannix said that through it all, the department has managed to maintain a consistent level of field strength. This, coupled with newfound operational efficiencies and stricter sentencing guidelines for violent criminals, has helped keep a lid on crime. “From the trends over the past 13 years, we are not experiencing a crime wave,” Mannix said. But he also conceded that some departmental programs — like the popular beat coordinator — have suffered as police administrators redeployed and reassigned officers to deal with the diminished numbers.
Fire and Police Commissioner Tom Parker — a former FBI agent and white collar crime security consultant — insisted that even Mannix’s own statistics indicated that crime was generally on the rise, though with peaks and valleys. When Parker told him this, Mannix replied, “Except our crime rates are going down, not up.” Parker also asked about anecdotal accounts how officers, on occasion, simply never show up to calls for service. Chief Sanchez replied that such officers are simply fired. Last year, he said one officer lost his job for just that.
Parker said he’s heard detectives express frustration about being reassigned off their caseload to uniform patrol because of staffing issues. When he brought this up during a monthly meeting to analyze recent crime trends, he said Sanchez got upset. Parker noted that shortly after the Fire and Police Commission meeting a month ago — at which Hunter delivered his critique — Sanchez notified him via email that no one outside the department would be allowed to attend the monthly crime trend briefing. Parker — who has locked horns with Sanchez in the past — suspected the decision was retaliatory in nature. He broached the subject last Thursday, starting off, “I’m sorry to ask this question.” Sanchez quickly jumped in, stating, “I’m sorry you asked that question because I asked you not to,” prompting Parker to reply, “And that’s exactly why I’m asking it.” Sanchez said some in the department expressed discomfort at having individuals outside the department — city administrators, councilmembers, and commission members — involved. “It’s not personal,” Sanchez said. “I asked you not to take it personally.” Parker replied, “I do have to say the timing seemed quite strange.”


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Share Article
Myspace



Previous Month



Comments
Det. Jaycee Hunter was accused of “overstating the facts, understating the facts, and plain-old fashioned misstating the facts.” This should come as no surprise since Hunter is well known as a rogue cop in the SBPD. He has had a history of misconduct that has been documented in the media. Every police department has its bad apple, and Hunter is ours. It is shocking that the POA should designate him, with all the good cops available, as their spokesman. Hunter should be fired.
zorro (anonymous profile)
July 29, 2010 at 1:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Cops take care of cops. Not matter how heinous.
Cut the Police budget by 90%
rstein9 (anonymous profile)
July 30, 2010 at 7:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I don’t understand the cop haters? You must have blinders on if you can’t see a good, decent honest cop that stands up for what is the truth rather than manipulate the facts to get personal gain. Frank Mannix is honest, fair and a genuinely good person, like most of the people he works with. If there were problems you can trust he will let us know and do his utmost to resolve them. His motives are solely for the benefit of the community. Just like any other entity in this economy, his can use more money, but he is not going to lie to get it or manipulate the facts for personal reward. If SBB&T or Pacific Bank Corp (whoever they are) would have run their entity with the same motives our “hometown” bank would not be owned by a Texan. But that is a different kind of crime.
It would be nice to see some recognition from the bashers that all cops are not bad and that in fact they are doing a great job protecting us, our community and our children with the limited resources they have. Thank you Officer Mannix for telling the truth..
joerak (anonymous profile)
July 30, 2010 at 8:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Am I the only person who thinks that a $194,000 / year salary for a cop is outrageus? SInce when did police become the ruling class of society?
Here's a simple math problem for all the geniuses in Santa Barbara.
Take your annual salary, divide it by 194,000, and times it by 100. That is the percentage of value you are to society that Cam Sanchez is in the eyes of our elected officials.
Ex: someone making $50,000 / year
(above the median income range)
50,000/194,000*100 = 25.77% of a Cam Sanchez.
So basically Cam Sanchez is worth nearly 4 of you in the eyes of our Union Council, I mean City Council.
jtevis3 (anonymous profile)
July 30, 2010 at 4:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)
For all of you hourly workers. You think $15 / hour is pretty reasonable, right? I know plenty of people that make that or less in SB.
Let's do the CAM comparison:
$15/hour, 40 hours per week = $31,200 gross income
31,200 / 194,000 * 100 = 16% of the worth of Mr. Sanchez in the eyes of our Union Council.
Basically he is worth 6 and a quarter of you $15/hour workers.
jtevis3 (anonymous profile)
July 30, 2010 at 4:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Two distinct arguments are emerging here, one of which smells suspiciously like "communism":
#1. Cops and police brass may make way more than their jobs warrant.
#2. There should be restrictions on pay as to not have wage disparity amongst Santa Barbara wage earners; that is, running a Police Department with over 130 sworn officers, being effectively the CEO of a department budget of tens of millions is not worth $195,000 per year.
I'm okay with examining #1, but can't cotton to the ideas behind #2 argument as expounded by "jtevis3."
Chester_Arthur_Burnett (anonymous profile)
July 30, 2010 at 5:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I am not so sure that the 120k base top for street officers or the 200k for top brass, and generous benefits is out of line. What are the factors considered in the negotiating process.
If we are going to have arbitrary "means testing" for salaries I would suggest that the alcohol serving establishment's employees and owners perhaps make too much and I don't even know how much they make. How much should a coffee house barista providing us goodies make compared to an officer that deals with us in embarrassing, compromising, illegal and tense situations on a daily basis.
Regardless I do think that we are understaffed in the "traffic squad" department. Staffing is at about 50% of what it was 60 years ago and traffic crime is perceptibly up if you notice the number of requests for humps, bumps and chicanes. If you just consider the number of "miles driven" traffic enforcement has not kept pace. When new traffic laws, such as talking and texting are added to the patrol's responsibility it would make sense that you would need more patrol officers otherwise older or existing traffic laws would lose enforcement. Perhaps that is why we all tend to drive like jerks at times.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
July 31, 2010 at 8:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
P.S. I think Cam does a good job and I am not trying to undermine him as a Police Chief. I am just making a point that across the board, the unions have accumulated excessive pay & benefits from our city council. You can look at the Parks & Rec. director, Fire Dept., HR Managers for the City, SEIU workers, etc. and it will be the same result.
Ah well, it is what it is and that's what Santa Barbarans want.
jtevis3 (anonymous profile)
July 31, 2010 at 9:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)
And to respond to Chester, the police force is not a free market enterprise so you can't hold them to the same level of judgment as the private sector. "Smelling of Communism" would be saying that CEO's of actual companies should not be paid a certain amount of money like our great leader, Obama has declared. The police force is funded by tax dollars, so since it is a public good, the people should have a say when pay & benefits become excessive. Unfortunately, we don't because the politicians get elected with funding from the unions who receive this high level of pay. It's a nice little circle: Unions will pump money into getting you elected, then you get into office and vote for their raises so they can keep pumping money into getting you elected.
I personally don't feel protected by having a cop in my neighborhood looking to write me up for a seat belt ticket or when the miserable parking ticket enforcement lady drives up and down the block at 8 AM sharp taking pictures of my car & looking to write as many $50 tickets as possible. I kinda like being left alone and keeping to myself, but that is becoming increasingly more difficult in this world that has been created by politicians who impose their vision upon average people.
OOOoooooooooooooh the vicious cycle!!!!
jtevis3 (anonymous profile)
July 31, 2010 at 10:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)
And you can't compare a CEO salary to that of someone who is working for the government. In the private sector, pay levels are determined by the market (minus government intervention of minimum wage & other taxes). In the public sector, politicians determine pay scales. When the people who get politicians elected are the same ones they turn around and vote on their salaries, it seems corrupt to me just by the nature of it. How could we fix it? Hmmmm, maybe a survey of the population to see what they feel pay should be for police, SEIU workers, fire, etc.
However, we live in a representative democracy and expect the people we elect to serve our interests, but I feel they only serve those of the union and people who get them elected.
jtevis3 (anonymous profile)
July 31, 2010 at 10:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
jtevis3 you are wrong on a lot of your points. For one the managers of any city or county department (such as the police chief) are not part of any union, they are at will employee meaning that they are not part of any bargaining class. In fact no police officer is in a "union" as you villafy them. There is a police officer association, but that is only because the city refuse to negotiate pay with individuals and requires group to do collective bargaining for their memoarndum of understandings. It is a city requirements that has people like you spiining it off into a tangent.
You say that you can't compare a CEO salary with someone working in the public secor. Is not the law of supply and demand still in effect? What would make a CEO take a job paying $200K vs one paying $500K? One would expect that they would take the later based on the pay difference. The same holds true for public employees. Why would one want to be a cop somewhere and make $75k when they could make $85k somewhere else? Again, one would expect that they would choose the $85k job unless there are mitigating factors. You fail to take this into account.
InTheKnow (anonymous profile)
July 31, 2010 at 1:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
ITK:
You know who would take that job? The other 80% of the LE trained personel out of cali state (and out of work) that are paid 50K. Supply and demand indeed. How about we try it vs the same ruiness status quo?
sa1 (anonymous profile)
August 1, 2010 at 8:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
sa1
When you make up numbers you tend not to have a convincing argument. Where do you get 80% unemployeed number from? ...... weak........
InTheKnow (anonymous profile)
August 1, 2010 at 11:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
He wears his rank upside down (top point of stars should be towards the neck, not away from it). It is an embarrassment and an insult to all those who wear or have worn a uniform correctly.
upsidedownrank (anonymous profile)
December 14, 2010 at 3:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)