Toking Rights
Pot a Menace to Society?
Sunday, November 7, 2010
Call me naïve, but I thought that Proposition 19, which would have legalized marijuana in California, was going to pass. I couldn’t imagine that there would be overwhelming opposition. Why would there be? It certainly would be hard to find people in Isla Vista who opposed it.
There were, however, tons of people who voted no for a variety of reasons. They questioned how it would be regulated, how much revenue would be produced, and how it would work with federal laws in place that make marijuana possession illegal. Fair enough. I respect those who opposed the proposition for practical reasons, even though I don’t agree with them. But what about all the others who voted no for different reasons?
Cat Neushul
My friends have told me about their relatives who opposed the proposition out of fear. They envisioned a multitude of stoned individuals being let loose in society to wreak havoc. Somehow they thought legalizing marijuana would create a dire situation.
But there are already laws in place to penalize those who drive, or go out in public, high. Also, legalizing pot isn’t going to inspire non-users to light up. You either do or you don’t, and legalizing it isn’t going to change that. Another said they had relatives who opposed legalization because they’d heard it was a “gateway” drug. In this person’s eyes, it’s pot one day, crack the next. It’s hard for me even to address this fear. All I can say is: Really? Do you really think this is going to happen?
If you live in Santa Barbara, San Luis, or Santa Cruz counties you can breathe a little easier. All three of these counties voted to pass the proposition. Some northern counties, including Marin and Sonoma, did as well. You can visit the California Elections Web site and click around on a map to find out how each county voted in the recent election. It is fun to see which counties voted for Prop. 19. In Santa Barbara, the proposition passed by a small margin: 51 percent were in favor, 49 percent opposed.
In I.V. you would expect to hear voices raised in outrage at the defeat of the proposition, because there are quite a few people for whom smoking marijuana is a part of daily life. But I guess whether marijuana is legal or not doesn’t make that much difference. When you are living in I.V. and attending college, marijuana isn’t all that hard to locate.
If you are new to this area, or haven’t ventured into I.V., you might be surprised to find out how ingrained the pot culture is here. It is not unusual to walk into someone’s home and see an enormous bong displayed on living room table as though it were a work of art. (Some of them are in fact works of art.) And don’t expect the occupants to hide it when you walk in. They view it as a normal household item, like a coffee pot or a computer. Now ask the occupants what their dog’s name is; odds are pretty good that it’s something like Rasta, Stoner, or Doobie. Even Gaucho soccer games are not immune to this culture. When it says 4:20 on the clock, the students in the stands celebrate. If you don’t know what 4:20 means, you are not alone. Ask a friend. I did.
It would be interesting to take an inventory of the types of problems that occur in I.V., and see how many can be traced to marijuana use. In my informal information gathering, I’ve found that pot smokers tend to be a mellow, easygoing lot. They are less likely to have a wild party, with several kegs, and start fights. Instead, they might have a party with a reggae band, hang out with a small group of friends, and skateboard afterward.
While the abuse of any drug, including marijuana, has negative effects, the people who voted no on Proposition 19 for fear of the effect this would have on society need to take a second look.
I won’t ever be championing a “make crack legal” group. But as far as I’m concerned, the world would be a better place if we stopped trying to demonize something as innocuous as marijuana. Professors, medical doctors, and many other respectable people smoke marijuana even though it’s illegal. It is not going to be the downfall of civilization.
A law legalizing marijuana would squelch criminal activity and produce additional state revenue. It doesn’t matter whether it turns out to be billions or millions, money is money. Maybe next time a proposition like this is on the ballot, there will be more people who speak out and educate others about the evil caused by demonizing pot.
Related Links
Comments
Drug laws don't exist for the people that can handle their high, they exist for the people that can't handle their high. For example, oh I don't know, college students that get high all day. We as a country are losing ground to other countries in the fostering of intelligent productive young people. Seeing as pot makes people, at least while they are high, stupid and unproductive, must be seen as an obstacle to our country competing with others in this global economy. Should a successful adult be able to smoke a joint at the end of a hard day? Maybe. But too many of us remember the "stoner" kids from high school, and see them now working at gas stations or the like. The negatives of people that can't handle their high, in my opinion, far outweighs the positive selfish pleasure that those that can handle their high, get. For god's sake is it that terrible to not be high? Is the world so bad sober?
johnny123 (anonymous profile)
November 7, 2010 at 9:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Yes, the world is that bad sober. War after stupid war, including the drug war, endless. Corruption, greed and lust for money in our perverted society. Where is the finish line, the trophy, the end of prohibition? Why do we put up with laws that put our friends, family, foes in jail for possession and even small time cultivation of a plant? Prohibition failed on alcohol because drunks get angry (my stereotype). The reason it hasn't been overturned on Marijuana is because 1. it is smoked and 2. the people who use are too peacefull to put up a fight. Those who are against are living among many who do; friends, family, neighbors, doctors, firefighters, teachers. You don't see them demonizing those who drink beer, wine, smoke tobacco. The whole 'keep it away from our kids' argument is hog wash as well. I was a stoner kid with plenty of friends who also drank, got high in school. We are now teachers, lawyers, doctors, and hey, what is wrong with being a gas station attendant? Some people have no respect for others and that is the difference here.
I'm not saying we should tolerate the youth smoking grass, but we shouldn't put them in juvenile hall for it either. It was plenty easy to procure pot when I was in high school without the dispensaries. Hate to be the one to tell those who don't know, but pot is all around you, has been for all your life. It's applications go far beyond getting high, or smoking it for medicinal reasons.
spacey (anonymous profile)
November 7, 2010 at 12:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Beautifully written piece, thanks for so succinctly putting into words my thoughts and opinions Ms. Neushul.
IV sometimes seems to be the last vestige of what made Santa Barbara great: Arts, Culture, Happenings, Diversity, Progressiveness.
EZK (anonymous profile)
November 7, 2010 at 1:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Still not seeing this as anything more than a bunch of people wanting to get high so The Simpsons is REALLY FUNNY or so they can think the Dead is actually a good band. I get it, getting high makes you feel good, but, sorry to tell all you advocates, that if that is the only reason you think it should be legal, you are never going to win a vote from those that don't smoke pot.
johnny123 (anonymous profile)
November 7, 2010 at 9:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Johnny123,
We the People do not exist to be "productive" for the sake of assuring that "the country" can compete in the freakin Global Economy.
The Country exists to assure that We the People enjoy the blessings of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Some citizens pursue happiness by smoking pot. Others citizens, who may or may not have been potheads, pursue happiness by working at gas stations. Whether or not these freely chosen pursuits of individual citizens are maximizing the collective GNP is not something that anyone but a Borg Drone should worry about.
The thing to worry about is how much liberty the citizenry has lost to the Borg.
OldDawg (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2010 at 12:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)