Much to my surprise, I became a stay-at-home mom, despite the fact that it was in direct conflict with the way I was brought up, my value system, and how I anticipated I would lead my life. This happened a decade ago in San Francisco shortly after I discovered I was pregnant. The dot-com bubble had just burst, and I was laid off from my job at a high-tech company. My then-husband urged me to reconsider my options and not go back to work.
I was insulted and angered by his suggestion. I didn’t want to shut the door on my career. I had an Ivy League education and a fairly impressive résumé. My own mother — one of only eight women in her class at Harvard Medical School — was my role model. Women, smart women, had careers as well as having kids. Overachiever that she was, my mother had had six. I assumed I would just continue the family tradition.
I was even more upset when he suggested we relocate to Santa Barbara. I didn’t want to start motherhood without my cadre of friends, in a new city, no family. Santa Barbara was L.A. as far as I was concerned, and I hated L.A. Who was I going to hang out with — kale-eating Southern California bimbos? It was one of our only big disagreements. But I remembered the tension in my parents’ marriage, as my mom stretched herself between husband, kids, and a demanding career. For me, well, I would try and be open and give the Happy Homemaker path a try.
Since we could afford life without a second paycheck, I decided to get involved with nonprofits in my new town. I needed to keep my brain engaged, and I wanted my children to see the various ways one could participate in the world around them.
It turned out that many of the women I befriended in Santa Barbara also had impressive former lives and educations — doctors, lawyers, corporate executives, writers. These are “stay at home” moms who are anything but. They are the workhorses who power our schools, our charities, volunteering hundreds if not thousands of hours. They are the ones who offer to chair a fundraiser or preside over a board or donate just one more silent-auction item — and they do this time and time again.
Of course, there are mothers who are just too busy with their tennis lessons to have time to read to their children’s classes. But there are also mothers who hold jobs and yet can always be counted on to volunteer. A good friend of mine who runs her own company while chairing the school carnival says she will always work because she wants to show her daughter that one doesn’t need a partner in life just to be financially secure. What I have learned during these last 10 years is that each compromise can either strengthen or weaken us, and it can take years before we realize which one it is.
My moment of truth came when my husband announced he was leaving me. “Perhaps if you had gone back to work, you would be more interesting” was one of the many excuses he gave. I really wanted to kick him in a very interesting spot. Long story short, I had to go back to work. (“Interestingly” enough, it turns out what is enough to support one family is not enough to support two in the Santa Barbara Lifestyle we had become accustomed to.)
My kids reacted to my returning to work in many ways I expected: “I don’t want you to go to work; I want you to be here” and “Why can’t you go on the field trip?” What shocked me were these responses: “Why work? Daddy makes all the money,” “Daddy is a great businessman,” or “You worked? Why?” It turned out my daughters had thought about what they wanted to be when they grew up — pilot, doctor, mom, and rock star. But to them, my life was not much beyond being the taxi driver, party planner, sippy-cup washer — not the view I had of my mom, fighting against convention to be Carol Brady and Marcus Welby, MD.
All my volunteering had meant little to my kids. They didn’t know that I had helped develop their school’s Five-Year Strategic Plan, let alone that I spoke three languages, had a diplomatic passport, traveled around the world, and worked in major technology companies. I had dropped the ball on my mother. In one generation, despite my best intentions, I had brought it all back to Ozzie and Harriet.
I certainly enjoyed my early “retirement” in many ways and realize what a privilege it was. But stepping back from social progress, as many women have done in recent years, often has deeper impacts than we expect. As parents, we work so hard to educate the whole child, driving them to sports, to ballet class, to art and to music lessons, museums, camps — whatever we can afford. But how do we show them the value of social equality or persistence in the face of adversity or other life lessons that can puncture the “bubble” effect we create driving our children around in our safe SUVs?
My mother had been caught in the Wife’s Trifecta — marriage, career, motherhood. Even then, I saw how thin she was stretched. She would be up until 2 a.m., making cookies for a child’s class or reading medical journals. Unfortunately, cancer was her wake-up call, but it gave her the license to finally focus on herself. She published a book of poetry, took up acting, and began lecturing at her alma mater on her firsthand experience of how the doctor/patient relationship impacts healing.
Divorce was my call to action. Now I have the opportunity to show my kids, and myself, who I really am: that Mom can support herself, that Mom can deal with a major change of plans. Now my kids see me going to work and realize that the money I make pays for their hamster, their toys, their cookies, and our dinner. In time, they will also learn that while their father may have whatever business capabilities he was blessed with, Mom was able to land a job with a great company during a down economy, in a town with a relatively small job market, after 10 years of being out of the “official” work force.
It’s challenging not to be with my kids as much as I would like. But I know that I am there in other ways. I know that I value my time with them that much more, and I realize now how much they almost missed out on learning — about me, and more importantly, about themselves. And I too am learning of what I am really made.
If I don’t help my children to believe in their dreams, to lead by example, and to teach them that they are capable of changing the world (no matter in how small a way), then we all lose in the end. My mother did not live to meet my children, but I intend to continue her example of being a Role Mother — to show them that it is possible to achieve many different dreams. That is how I intend to define my own identity and my legacy.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace






Previous Month



Comments
As a product of a single mother who has worked her whole life and still had time to do all the stay at home mother things I am extremely offended by your recently divorced bitter attitude. You sound like a spoiled child who is angry about their new dose of reality.
Perhaps your value system may not have allotted you to be a stay at home mother, but what about those mothers who's core values are to be a stay at home mother? Are those mother's beneath your ideological integrity?
I know many mothers who would love the opportunity to stay at home with their children. You should be more grateful that you "could afford life without a second paycheck."
Maybe if you weren’t so bitter you would find better ways to be a "Role Mother" to your children than spending your time writing an article in which you insult their father, the city in which you live, and all the women who have taken the "Happy Homemaker" path.
Perhaps the next time someone urges to do something you will consider using that Ivy League education of yours to make an informed decision for yourself.
LuckySeven (anonymous profile)
December 2, 2011 at 11:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I have to say, I am really disappointed in the Independent for not only publishing this article online, but printing it as well! What a shame! Not only is this an ugly example of airing out one's dirty family laundry, it is also misrepresented. After doing a little research, I was able to find out that this "author" lives in a $2.5 million home paid for by her ex, receives a more than generous alimony and raises her children in a 50/50 custody plan. That does not sound like the single mom supporting herself to me. Though she seems to want to make the point that her husband emotionally abused her than left her with nothing, it is obvious that the only disappointment she is entitled to is in herself and her blatant self victimization. She even has the audacity to blame her own children for not appreciating her efforts! If you feel as though all your children see you as their 'sippy cup washer' then perhaps a clinical therapist is a more appropriate venue to vent these feelings of frustration rather than throwing your whole family under the bus in a poorly written public article. Overall, the whinny overtones of an overly privileged upper class woman is disgusting and tasteless on the Independent's part. Let's hear about 'the value of social equality or persistence in the face of adversity' from someone who has actually faced these obstacles.
Slate (anonymous profile)
December 2, 2011 at 11:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This piece seems to be more about a spoiled woman who is angry about her divorce and having to step into reality. How embarrassing for you to be so brash and insult your ex-husband for giving you an opportunity to experience what a large population of the entire world will not. Willingly and publicly! Divorce was your opportunity to take action? Doubtful. You had a choice to stay home (you did say "he urged you.") As educated as you claim to be, maybe you should have made an informed decision of your own.
You sound like an egotistical spoiled brat who looks down upon any mother who decides to stay home and care for her family. My husband knows that at any time I may go back to my career and put my Yale degree to use, if I so CHOOSE.
You also stated that you were acclimated to a Santa Barbara lifestyle. Most people are aware of what that means, even if they don’t live here. Welcome to what the rest of America has been dealing with: downsizing. I'd be shocked and awed if you didn't receive some portion of divorce settlement that allowed you "the Santa Barbara lifestyle" you are so keen to. I hope your children that you are trying to “Role Mother,” aren’t old enough to understand how you publicly ousted their father, insulted the city in which you live, and brag about basically doing nothing (oh, but there’s that diplomatic passport). It’s a good thing Santa Barbara is so small and not many read this paper. The rest of America would find this article to be a complete and utter joke. As do I.
Oh, by the way. My mother stayed at home and we could not afford it. But, my father supported her CHOICE (there's that funny word again). As far as I'm concerned, she was the best role model I could have ever had.
comedyhour (anonymous profile)
December 2, 2011 at 1:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow. This is very insulting to mothers that choose to stay-at-home with their kids. As a working mother myself, I work because I have to help support my family. My husband and I live in a small apartment and are working hard to save money to buy a house, and provide our son with a solid education and opportunities that we never had. This woman just sounds extremely bitter and privileged and doesn’t appreciate the opportunity that her ex-husband provided. I would love to have more time with my son. At the end of the day I believe we will be judged on how we raise our children, as they are the greatest reflections of ourselves. On their death bed, I doubt anyone says, “I wish I would have worked more.” Or maybe this author will……
I understand that re-locating is definitely hard, but cry me a river. Santa Barbara is one of the most beautiful places in the world. Most people would sacrifice a body part to be able to raise their family in SB, “on one paycheck.” But this woman seems so spoiled and focused on the negative, how would she recognize the beauty around her? I am also a little skeptical that she didn’t have any help with her kids. If she was able to write school plans and volunteer, she probably had nannies and maids to help her with all of the things that I and most other working moms have to do all by ourselves.
For being an ivy-league educated woman, she sounds really insecure, and I think the fact that she needed to publish this is just a cry for external validation. It’s actually a bad start to her attempt at being a “role-mother.” She also proves that being educated and affluent does not mean you have class, because a classy “role-mother” would not publicly bash their child’s father in public.
Oh and on a final note, I don’t think good role-mothers use immature insults and generalities because although I do enjoy kale, I am not a “Southern California Bimbo.”
Sid (anonymous profile)
December 2, 2011 at 3:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I am surprised by the negative reactions to this article. It is one woman's experience. To maintain the lifestyle she wants for herself and her children she has to go to work, that is the bottomline. Maybe you think her lifestyle is too grand, but that is frankly nobody's business but hers and hers alone since her husband is now out of the picture. To throw out information about her finanical situation as one post has done is crass and in very poor taste. The reality of divorce for many stay at home parents (men and women) is not good and to have such a negative reaction to something that happens all the time is strange. The fact of the matter is in this economy women and men who have chosen to stay home with their children will find it very difficult to get any job with a descent salary and there is a certain level of financial risk stay at home parents assume with their decision to stay at home. That is just a fact. I did not grow up in privledge and my view is I would never allow a man to be the sole source of inome for me, let alone the children we have together. It is not a risk I am willing to take. When I read articles such as this it reinforces my decision.
eastertoday (anonymous profile)
December 3, 2011 at 9:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
A cringe-inducing read. I hope Ms. Heafitz gets herself sorted out... somewhere in there is a wonderful person struggling to get out. I started thinking as I read this... abjectly poor families in India are way happier than her family. SUV's, expensive homes, great businessmen, three languages, diplomatic passports `yawn'.
snugspout (anonymous profile)
December 4, 2011 at 1:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thank you for sharing your thoughts in such a beautifully written and well thought out piece. I applaud you for your courage in sharing your personal experiences. I was moved, as were my peers throughout the country, to whom I forwarded this article. You are clearly a very accomplished woman who has taken her life experiences and turned them into a productive and positive learning experience. Your children are very fortunate to have someone like you as their role model. As a working professional in this town I feel inspired and motivated by your article. Thank you.
workingmother (anonymous profile)
December 4, 2011 at 3:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Here is my take on it--although I'm only hearing one side of the story: She and her husband took wedding vows and involved children in their world. HE broke that vow and walked out on his wife and kids. Despite the way our culture glamorizes divorce with the whole "moving-on-and-experiencing-growth" psychobabble, (I think of how Tom Cruise, Donald Trump and Michael Douglas were celebrated when they dumped their wives for younger women) kids are devastated, finances are usually greatly affected, the rejected adult feels bitter and betrayed, and the kids--often being too young to understand the deeper effects of what is happening, are often affected in a way that it sets them up for future failures in relationships.
Conclusion: Based on what I'm reading here, the author has done the best she can with a difficult situation; her ex-husband should man up and come back to her.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
December 4, 2011 at 4:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hi Betsy,
How incredibly fortunate you are to have choices now. You can continue to serve your children (even if they don't notice it outwardly, it impacts them on a visceral level) and your community.
You can probably choose to work or not, depending on the SB lifestyle that you choose. 'Choice' being my theme here, many people, even smart, ivy league educated people don't have a choice when it comes to having to spend the majority of their prime waking hours at work to support two small children without any alimony or child support.
So you have a choice to step out of the box and make a difference here; or go back to work..or both. What ever your choice I really believe that if you are happy, fulfilled and evolving, your children will benefit. So use what you've got and make the best out of this for yourself. Because you can.
I applaud you and your ability to choose and hope that you will be one of those people who make this community great.
Best of luck and thanks for writing that.
larkannx (anonymous profile)
December 4, 2011 at 4:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thank you Independent for publishing this beautifully written piece. The author clearly has a way with words, and is talented with authentic,writing from the heart.
I gathered so many emotions from this article, and it has left me with much to reflect on.
First and foremost, this woman's husband walked out on his commitment, his children, and his vows. The author has been forced to reevaluate her life, her future and redefine herself in these new circumstances. She chose not to play the victim, but to find out what she is really made of. I see so much strength in her determination to sort the mess of an unexpected divorce.
I don't think the question or controversy is about working, or not working, I think it is about finding yourself once you are betrayed and finding fulfillment again. The author is clearly a bright, educated, and insightful in her journey with this new reality. She is redefining "Role Mother" in her spirit. I know without a doubt her children are blessed to have this kind, loyal, intelligent woman to call mom. Keep up the writing, you evoke us, intrigue us, and leave us wanting more!
CMH (anonymous profile)
December 4, 2011 at 7:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The Pillsbury Dough Boy had a roll mother.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
December 5, 2011 at 1:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I think this article was very insightful. Not sure at all where the negative comments are coming from. I think most women can relate to this article and can certainly respect how the author has dug deep in reinventing her life in very difficult circumstances. Thank you for sharing your story!
ginacastro (anonymous profile)
December 5, 2011 at 12:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)
No one else has mentioned it, so I will throw it in--I think that a major point in this letter, is that the husband was the impetus behind her leaving work (whether the decision was good, or not), and then used the result as a reason to dump her, "Perhaps if you had gone back to work, you would be more interesting".
As the saying goes, there are three sides to every story: His, Hers, and the Truth. So I am certain that there is bias in the letter, yet still recognize the hypocrisy in the reasoning.
equus_posteriori (anonymous profile)
March 14, 2012 at 2:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)