The Hound Abounds
How Newt Gingrich Rises from the Ashes, Revives the “Theory of Lee”
Thursday, December 15, 2011
MARK OF THE LEE: For some courageous souls, the unexamined life ain’t worth living. But for me, I’ve found that denial, compartmentalization, and outright amnesia are indispensable for getting through the day. Little wonder, then, I’ve forgotten more than I ever knew. Or in some cases, more than I ever wrote. Over the weekend, it was brought to my attention that Newt Gingrich’s middle name is Leroy. It was as though for the very first time, even though, years ago, I’d actually written a column highlighting this same ominous fact. Where Newt is concerned, amnesia is no random malfunction of cognition; it’s the desperate act of a sane mind seeking to save itself by shutting out facts that do not comport with how the world should function. Yet here he is, as undead as all the zombies and vampires currently choking our collective pathway to cinematic escape.
Angry Poodle
For those of you from Mars, the Theory of Lee reveals that anyone with the first, last, or middle name of Lee, Leroy, and all the variants therein is the secular equivalent of Cain’s child. While a few Lees manage to resist the destructive nature of their destinies, most grow into born-again, card-carrying sociopaths. When Cottage Hospital got fined $50,000 last week, for example, it was because a woman named Leianna, dressed in a nurse’s scrubs, had abducted a brand new baby there a few years ago. Those of you who mutter about Cottage’s stricter security procedures should remember it’s a Lee thing. The middle-aged perv from Carpinteria who planted a tiny video camera in the book Chicken Soup for the Soul and planted it in the bookcase of his girlfriend’s daughter’s bedroom — so he could watch — was also a Lee. The crazy guy who shot and wounded Arizona Congressmember Gabrielle Giffords — and killed six others — was a Lee. He’s now asserting his inalienable rights not to be forced to take his meds. By so not taking, he can remain safely as he is, which is not competent to be tried for his crimes. Prosecutors should simply cede that point and quickly move to change the shooter’s middle name instead. The results, I assure you, would prove far more dramatic.
Republican voters, it seems, find alleged frontrunner Mitt Romney so offensively earnest, false, and boring — not to mention Mormon — that they’re willing to allow the self-disgraced but engagingly self-intoxicated Newt a new lease on life. Poison-penned purists like conservative columnist George Will are wonderfully horrified. He derided Gingrich as “a hired larynx” for the special-interest profiteers who’ve made “modern Washington repulsive.” By that, Will referred to the $1.6 million Gingrich was paid by Freddie Mac in the wake of the home-loan scandal. Newt — a former history professor — has insisted he was paid, instead, for his historical insights. The last time Gingrich sought to peddle his historical insights, he got officially bitch-slapped by his congressional colleagues — the vote was a very bipartisan 325 to 28 — for multiple ethics violations and was sanctioned $300,000. Gingrich had created multiple political organizations that masqueraded as educational institutions — a tax-code violation for which Gingrich sought, and obtained, multiple tax exemptions — another tax-code violation. Newt’s record for hypocrisy, however, remains unmatched for leading the impeachment crusade against Bill Clinton — stemming from his infatuation with beguiling hair hopper Monica Lewinsky — while simultaneously cheating on his own wife, who was suffering from cancer. Gingrich, who has embraced almost as many religions as he has women, knows you can get away with murder as long as you express contrition later. He has yet to apologize, however, for twice shutting down the federal government long before such self-destructive tantrums would become an almost weekly ritual.
The richest 130,000 taxpayers would see their tax bills drop $1.9 million per year. The poorest 10 percent would see savings of $63 a year.
Now that it’s become socially acceptable to discuss class warfare, it’s worth noting that as Speaker of the House, Gingrich was responsible for passing the biggest capital-gains taxes in history. Now, he’s back at it, having unveiled a new tax scheme that would cost the federal treasury $1.3 trillion its first year. When you consider the “super” Senate committee couldn’t figure out how to trim $1.2 trillion over 10 years, that’s impressive. With his plan, Gingrich qualifies as the second coming of the Newtron Bomb. The richest 130,000 taxpayers would see their tax bills drop $1.9 million per year. The poorest 10 percent would see savings of $63 a year. In the meantime, the federal government would have to gut programs and basic services at a rate that truly staggers the imagination. While Newt is working overtime to squeeze the needy to grease the greedy, it’s worth meditating on a recent study — put out by the Public Policy Institute — showing that since the Great Recession, California’s poorest people saw their incomes drop 20 percent, while those at the top experienced a 5-percent reduction. In the Central Coast — from Monterrey to Santa Barbara counties — median family income dropped the furthest and the fastest, from $56,973 to $46,783. Since the Great Recession, the percentage of low-income households on the Central Coast rose from 40.2 percent to 47.6. But when the higher cost of living is factored in, the real number is 51 percent. Fifty-one percent! Despite what Newt thinks, most economists agree few new jobs are created by giving the very wealthy even more money. To the extent tax breaks help, they argue, payroll tax breaks for businesses hiring new employees can be genuinely useful. But long-term, education remains the single best investment if you want to help people move up the economic food chain. But education is clearly the next white meat, and that hacking and hewing sound you’re hearing is that of schools under attack.
Undeniably, Newt’s throw-down showdown with Mitt Romney constitutes delicious theater, but when I go out to a show, I’d rather not lose my dinner in the process. In the meantime, I’ll be hanging out in the lobby, working hard to forget what I never wanted to know.
Related Links
Comments
Current census data indicates that one in two Americans are "living" at or below the poverty level.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
December 15, 2011 at 1:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I can't believe that any of my Conservative debate "opponents" here on the INDY site could possible support this man (Gingrich) and his ideas. At 1:11 he jokingly suggests that maybe the Bush Admin should have let a few terrorist attacks take place "just to remind people." And you have issues with Jane Fonda from 40 years ago?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qN4I3Q...
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
December 17, 2011 at 2:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Ken: Neither the conservative nor the liberal in me can support Gingrich.
Any man who hands his wife her divorce papers when she's in the hospital with cancer (she survived and is alive) is not a person that I can trust.
If Gingrich is what "Family Values" people support--and they think that there is nobody who is better fit to run the country--than these people are delusional.
I don't plan to vote for Obama either lest I be called a Democrat Party shill.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
December 18, 2011 at 2:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Latest news: Gingrich and Romney tied at 30% for Republican lead.
As one of the talk show hosts pointed out "Even though Mormons are supposed to by polygamous it's *Gingrich* who has had more than one wife.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2011 at 2:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Newt is dangerous because he is smart and unethical. Can't vote for him even one time under any circumstances.
Obama is dangerous because he's smart, incompetent, and an incumbent. Can't vote for him a second time under any circumstances.
I guess I could vote for Romney as I liked his state specific program for healthcare and he's not an ideologue.
This sucks all over again...
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2011 at 8:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Let's see, as a frequent critic of President Obama let's take a look at what he's had to deal with: he inherited a ruined economy, he's battled veiled and not so veiled racism as reactions to his plans both within the Congress and outside of it; and in general a Congress now that has been more willing to sabotage the country than help rebuild it.
My criticisms: been too lenient and willing to compromise with the then Minority Party when he took office and the still Minority party in the Senate. CNN and mainstream news would like to paint the national "Left/Right Divide" as 50/50 but in reality the country self identifies as approx 70% .
Liberal/Progressive and approx 30% Conservative (not factoring in Party registration but actual political opinions.) If we had a more acccurate representation of the actual politics of the country we wouldn't be wasting time talking about Gingrich and Romney much less have them and the likes of Bachman and Cain thrust in our faces.
Obama dangerous? Maybe if you're bin Laden! . Better a community organizer than someone like Romney who's made millions destroying communities.
@Italiansurg: You might like Romney's state specific healthcare plan but he's now disavowed it.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2011 at 9:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)
But at least we have Newt to unite us. We are uNewted.
From Elayne Boosler:
""Gingrich Supporter Begs Him To Be 'Humble'." 'You must have me confused with a mere mortal', said the bubbling gas bag, and flew away."
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2011 at 11:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Yup, Obama the first "President Victim". The most powerful man on earth and he's still a victim...Worst of all is that he was completely unable to lead his own party when they held sway for two years and could have rammed anything through.
I'm not in love with Romney by any stretch but, although we disagree, he's the lesser of evils in my OPINION.
At any rate, Merry Christmas KV. Use the new year to realize many of us are not ideologues and in my case my views are probably +75% in agreement with most liberals.
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2011 at 7:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Merry Christmas to you too.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2011 at 9:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Maybe if you're bin Laden!"
I think he is...GREAT...now I've got Bin Laden AND Bormann to deal with.
Where's Stalin?
billclausen (anonymous profile)
December 21, 2011 at 2:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Here is a good reason NOT to support Obama.
http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/three...
billclausen (anonymous profile)
December 21, 2011 at 2:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"Maybe if you're bin Laden!"
I just cracked the code: It's not "Bin Laden" it's "Bin LEEden".
billclausen (anonymous profile)
December 21, 2011 at 2:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Stalin? What about Mussolini? I guarantee il Dulce made it out no matter what we believe happened...
With regards to the NDAA, if this had been a Republican President the Progressives would be burning down cities over this act. Mind you, the biggest problem I had with the secret prisons during Bush was that they were TOO STUPID TO KEEP THEM SECRET and the value of this system was that governments do a lot of things we don't know about and we hope the majority of these things are good. And no, that's not my endorsement of secret stupidity, think Iran/Contra or our current Fast and Furious debacles, it's just an acknowledgment of reality.
The Obama administration is now so bold that they're willing to publicly support the NDAA and the ability to detain Americans without due process. Socialists become oppressors once again...
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
December 21, 2011 at 7:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm definitely not happy and have been quite vocal in opposition to that bill Italiansurg, if not yet on this site. It's all a stage that was set by The "Patriot" Act. It's disgusting. It's scary. It's a harbinger of an end.
I only dropped by to share that Anonymous has managed to make Newt fun, at least for a little while. As of this post, if you go to newtgingrich.com it's a carnival of Newtonian highlights.*
* I'm not responsible for programming changes, including but not limited to actual contact with Gingrich, adult material and an all encompassing etcetera. Posted for entertainment purposes only.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
December 21, 2011 at 11:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"Stalin? What about Mussolini? I guarantee il Dulce made it out no matter what we believe happened..."
That's right Benito, I know you made it out. Now you, Bormann and "Hank" (who is Bin Leeden) are all in the same blogesphere.
Tout le monde sont ici!
billclausen (anonymous profile)
December 21, 2011 at 7:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Why do you think I publicly excoriate the former Occupy Whatever Movement? Privately and in secret I was hanging out in plain sight with them, smelling potential totalitarian victory, (well, that and human stench) after my years of simply partying 24/7 in I.V. while wincing fearfully over my shoulder at "Hank's" insistence that he perform another necessary high colonic?
My hope for public resurrection has been crushed.
Back to the pipe I guess...hey KVDMJL! over here with that puppy...
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
December 22, 2011 at 6:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Now that you (Benito) Bormann, and fugitive-hider "Waz" have all been outed, it's time to put aside your differences and work for the good of Isla Vista--and humanity.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
December 22, 2011 at 4:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)