On November 28, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) designated 360 square kilometers of California coast up to a depth of six meters as critical habitat for the black abalone.
This is great news for not only black abalone, a species whose numbers have declined rapidly in the last few decades and is listed under the Endangered Species Act, but also for the entire Californian nearshore ecosystem. Designating habitat as critical goes beyond the normal protections afforded an individual species listed under the Endangered Species Act. By protecting the species’s habitat and designating it as critical, the NMFS is protecting not just habitat currently occupied by black abalone but also potential habitat into which the species can expand and recover.
Once a habitat is listed as critical, any federal project (or project that receives federal assistance or requires federal permits) that affects the habitat must be identified, assessed, and its impacts mitigated if possible. For example, if an agricultural operation uses pesticides requiring a federal permit, they must prove that their operations will not negatively affect black abalone or the designated critical habitat into which they may expand. This is a huge step toward safeguarding the marine ecosystem for not only black abalone but for other wildlife that call the nearshore ecosystem their home as well, such as sea otters.
Southern sea otters, also listed under the Endangered Species Act, have long been blamed by fishing groups for the rapid decline of black abalone. These groups have often used the decline of the black abalone as a reason for restricting the sea otter’s range. They claim that sea otters, some of which prey on black abalone as a part of their natural diet, are the main driver of the black abalone’s decline in California. The NMFS reconfirmed, in their response to comments on their proposed rule to declare a critical habitat for black abalone, that sea otters are not a main driver of the black abalone’s decline. In particular, the NMFS claimed:
1. Sea otters were absent from southern California during the widespread decline of black abalone in that region.
2. The current last foothold for black abalone (i.e. central and north-central California habitats) directly overlaps with the current range of sea otters.
3. One of the only places in southern California where black abalone populations have been increasing and where multiple recruitment events have occurred since 2005 (i.e. San Nicolas Island) is also the only place south of Point Conception where a growing population of southern sea otters exists, indicating that black abalone populations can recover and remain stable in the presence of sea otters.
Based on the best available science, sea otters are not to blame for the black abalone’s decline. In fact, the NMFS claims that historical overfishing and poaching, along with disease, are the prime culprits for the decline of the black abalone.
Though critical habitat for black abalone is a good step in the right direction, incredibly important species like sea otters are still struggling to survive in the increasingly polluted Californian coastal waters. Now is the time to celebrate for the additional protections afforded our coastal ecosystem, but Californians should remain vigilant in the fight for a healthy marine environment. Write your representatives to let them know you support a clean coastal environment so that wildlife, like the black abalone and the sea otter, can thrive.
Jason Lutterman is a program manager for Friends of the Sea Otter, a nonprofit organization founded in 1968 dedicated to the conservation of the sea otter and its habitat. Find more information at www.seaotters.org.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Black abs (& their empty shells) and otters were abundant at Cambria ten years ago. But at SB & Goleta from late 60's to late 90's, I found just one black ab, and that was in the late 70's (long before otters came back). What do local divers know about this?
Wiki blames their decline on overfishing and the Withering Syndrome. They also cite competition for space with sea urchins, a favorite otter prey item.
As a side note, old timers will recall fenced yards visible from the freeway at Ellwood, piled 5 or 6 feet high with red ab shells.
But my g-g-generation also recalls city limits signs putting SB's population at 18,000. If the current crop of young adults doesn't tear themselves away from their electronic diversions soon, well, they'll still have their electronic diversions.
Adonis_Tate (anonymous profile)
December 30, 2011 at 12:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
i am in monterey home of fotso (friends of the sea otter) and the monterey bay aquarium champions of and self appointed stewards of the marine environment. if what fotso is saying is true then why doesn't monterey have any black abalone? the answer is fotso is not telling the truth. there are no black abalone in monterey because sea otters have eaten them all. in fact the sea otters have eaten everything that can't out swim them. there are no mussels, no limpets, no barnicles, no sea urchins not even a starfish. sea otters are the reason and fotso wants you to believe otherwise.
swest (anonymous profile)
December 31, 2011 at 11:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hi everyone,
Steve Shimek here with The Otter Project. Just to clarify, The Otter Project is a different organization than Friends of the Sea Otter.
Jason with FSO is correct in his statements that overfishing and disease were huge factors in the black abalone's decline. But I don't want to paint the picture that sea otters and abalone FISHERIES can co-exist... I doubt they can. Sea otters will take abalones they can reach and otters can reach about the same distance into a crevice a person can.
But the picture that "swest" paints is just wrong. There are abalone, mussels, barnacles, stars, and sea urchins in Monterey. (Some of the largest red abalone you will ever see are deep in crevices offshore Hopkins Marine Station). Our marine life is rich and incredibly diverse. Some would like to paint the picture that otters eat everything. It's just not true.
With sea otters comes an increase in biodiversity and productivity -- these are facts. And, sea otters change the fabric of the nearshore ecosystem. Because of this change, fisheries change -- generally from shellfish fisheries (although we have those here in Monterey too) to finfish fisheries.
Steve Shimek
SteveShimek (anonymous profile)
January 3, 2012 at 11:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Why can't the biologist figure out that when La Nina comes with water that kills the abalone's food source for a long period of time the numbers decline? In the early 1970's I had a picture off the west end of Santa Cruz at 90' that had ton's of AB's in a cave protected by a narrow crevice that no one could pass through. The abalone are coming back, I have seen them walking on top of rocks 180 degrees out of the harbor in 35’ of water at SC Island. If the kelp dies again then they will die and we will have to wait for their plankton babies drift back and stick to the rocks.
jw (anonymous profile)
January 5, 2012 at 7:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)