Hard to Believe: It’s been five years since I walked out of the Santa Barbara News-Press newsroom where I’d worked for 46 years.
Today, I have no regrets whatsoever about giving up my column, paycheck, and window office. Oh, I could have stayed and collected my salary while all about me was plunging into an ethical chaos and top editors were quitting in disgust.
After all, owner Wendy McCaw wasn’t on my back. But I’d just returned from vacation that first week of July, 2006, and found that my co-workers were being unfairly harassed and punished, just for honestly covering and editing the news.
McCaw’s celebrity friends were more important than ethical journalism. After hearing the horror stories of all that had transpired while I was gone, I began packing up my things. When executive editor Jerry Roberts—a fine journalist who had been a top political reporter, and then managing editor of the San Francisco Chronicle—returned from his vacation that fateful Thursday and quit along with other top editors, I knew it was the end.
I picked up my remaining item, a lamp I’d brought in, and went home. I talked with my wife, Sue, and e-mailed in my resignation. In the months to follow about 70 others quit or were illegally fired.
Circulation plummeted and what was once a proud, fine small-city newspaper cannot even be called a newspaper any longer, not because we’re not there but because journalistic standards don’t exist on De la Plaza any longer. This is not only a tragedy for those who lost their jobs but for the community as a whole.
When I quit I had no future plans. Somewhere in the back of my mind I figured on living on our savings. But to my surprise, I got a call the next day, July 7, from Marianne Partridge, editor-in-chief of The Independent, asking me to consider joining the staff. It came out of the blue.
I was happy to do so and I’m honored to still be part of an excellent newspaper that lives up to its name. There aren’t many of us—“we happy few,” as Shakespeare put it in another context.
After the meltdown began, the News-Press newsroom decided to organize to protect the staff from its rampaging owner and voted to affiliate with the Teamsters. Soon eight reporters were fired for their union activities—an illegal act, a National Labor Relations Board administrative judge ruled, and he ordered them reinstated.
But with plenty of money at her disposal, McCaw has appealed this and many other findings that she broke federal labor laws. It has been argued that she has a right to run her newspaper as she wishes, even run it into the ground; but she’s also doing it in blatant defiance of the law.
Her union-busting efforts will be the subject of a July 28 De la Guerra Plaza rally marking the five-year anniversary of this never-ending dispute. I wish I could say that we’re seeing the light at the end of the legal tunnel. But because McCaw and her millions are taking advantage of weak labor laws, a shorthanded NLRB board, and her right to appeal, the fired reporters are still awaiting a return to work and for her to begin bargaining in good faith.
Yes, it is a mess. One that didn’t have to happen to our town and to what was a fine newspaper. The toughest job on a newspaper, I think, is that of the owner-publisher. He or she must allow reporting “without fear or favor,” as the late owner T.M. Storke used to say. Even when your pet causes don’t get preferential treatment or your Hollywood friends complain . It takes courage. I wish she’d see the light.
See you all on July 28.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Seriously, it's time to let this go. I'm no fan of the N-P, canceled long ago, but it's time to move on mentally/emotionally etc. How long will former N-P staffers, not to mention the rather obsessional Craig Smith, need to memorialize the "meltdown." Clearly, the N-P is far worse than it once was, but let's be honest: It was an OK local paper at best, not all that exceptional, and the current owners and management do have the right to run it into the ground if that's what they choose to do.
zappa (anonymous profile)
July 7, 2011 at 8:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Can't agree with you, zappa. The issue is not the paper, which can be run any way by the owner.
For many who believe is equal justice under the law, until the illegally fired workers receive their fair treatment, the issue can't and shouldn't die. As Barney correctly puts it:
"But with plenty of money at her disposal, McCaw has appealed this and many other findings that she broke federal labor laws. It has been argued that she has a right to run her newspaper as she wishes, even run it into the ground; but she’s also doing it in blatant defiance of the law."
binky (anonymous profile)
July 7, 2011 at 11:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Up through spring of 2006, the Newspress was a really good newspaper getting even better and kicking the butt of the Independent with scoops on many stories. The Indy pretty much gave up on the scoops and resolved to be better, but not always faster.
Then we knew all was sinking when Newspress reporter Josh Molina tried to write a story that summer about the Santa Barbara city police checking out a new downtown office rental space but could not include the address in his article. Imagine today writing about new city police facilities but not mentioning the address.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
July 7, 2011 at 1:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I arrived too late to know the good News Press. I understand it had a solid reputation and worked diligently to serve the news needs of this community. Since arriving in 2007, I've only been able to read the maddeningly unethical, weakly written, badly edited waste of newsprint that the N-P is today. So, a five year commemoration to mark the disappearance of an important community institution -- especially as journalism itself struggles -- seems a fitting event for all concerned. In fact, I'd like to see an even bigger effort to confront this gap in Santa Barbara. Community information task force anyone?
mvm (anonymous profile)
July 8, 2011 at 12:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
some have too much money.
spacey (anonymous profile)
July 8, 2011 at 2:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It is all about the disconnect that rich people go through for having heard "Yes sir, or No ma'am" too many times. After you are inducted into the pool that Narcissus fell into, you loose sight that you are in a house of mirrors. It is all about how your ego perceives how others see you, as in fashion (I wear this because this is how others see me), which is the exact definition of a psychosis. But those things happen so long ago in a rich person's life that they seem to look out at the rest of us with pity, as in god loves me and not you, obviously. Vaingloriousness plain and simple however to impart to the rich that this is what has happened is futile for a rigid ego is just that, rigid. So let them loose the grand opportunity they have been given to serve others and instead serve themselves.
contactjohn (anonymous profile)
July 9, 2011 at 1:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Just got my updated SB Dictionary.
One entry hasn't changed.
After the word 'devil': Wendy McCaw.
Draxor (anonymous profile)
July 9, 2011 at 8:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)