Besos de los Perros
Carpinteria’s Conundrum: Joe Won’t Go
Thursday, January 12, 2012
PICKLED TINK: I had high hopes it might be the second coming of Godzilla versus Mothra. In one corner, there was Billy Connell, Carpinteria’s famed Hot Dog Man, a one-time boxer and army veteran who has repeatedly hurled himself — head first — into the brick wall of California’s tax bureaucracy on behalf of push-cart vendors who once served in the military. In the other was Joe Armendariz, the sneeringly contemptuous Carpinteria City Councilmember, whose ability to consume death-defying quantities of alcohol has criminally befogged his judgment. But by the time the cops were called and the shouting was over, it had been more like a painfully messy family intervention only masquerading as a City Council meeting. Only nobody got saved.
Angry Poodle
To a bizarre degree, Santa Barbara’s major controversies have been fueled by high-profile drunken-driving cases. The unholy meltdown of the News-Press was initially precipitated six years ago when its poisoned-pen editorial-page editor, Travis Armstrong, was popped for a deuce while driving the wrong way down a one-way street, an astonishingly apt metaphor for everything that’s befallen that paper since. And who can forget the oceans of ink the News-Press gave Peter Lance this past year to detail the extent to which he’d been unfairly persecuted by the SBPD for driving under the influence? Whatever legit point Lance may have had got lost in the din of his megalomania. But regardless, his articles inflicted serious damage to the Police Department’s reputation. Most recently, Armendariz — Santa Barbara’s leading proponent of au contrarian conservatism — drove his car off Highway 101, down a ditch, and into a tree by Padaro Lane. When the medics got there, his blood-alcohol level was 0.18, more than twice the legal limit. It was the second time in five years Armendariz rolled a car while skunked out of his mind.
In Carpinteria, the closest thing to Mayberry Santa Barbara’s got, such antics don’t play well. Joe’s council colleagues clearly want him to step down, for their sake and for his. But unlike the City of Santa Barbara, Carpinteria has no clause in its charter that allows councilmembers to be impeached for crimes of “moral turpitude.” Joe is holding on to the bitter end. He’s getting help, he said. He’s admitted his mistakes. He doesn’t need to quit. It would take someone showing up at the council meetings with “a loaded gun,” he said during an impromptu press conference at Monday night’s meeting, to get him to resign. It figures. Joe has repeatedly demonstrated his willingness to place the rest of us at grave risk because he feels entitled to drink and drive. With his “loaded gun” remark, he indicated a similar willingness to put his council colleagues in harm’s way — however hypothetically — because he refuses to step down. A number of people showed up to “do the right thing,” mostly for the sake of his own recovery. Most were genuinely sweet and kind. By contrast, The Hot Dog Man was hell-bent on scorched-earth. It wasn’t character assassination he had in mind, but annihilation. He accused Joe of so abusing his dog that the Humane Society had to take him away. He gave the council a couple of alarming-looking photographs of the dog, named Maggie, to prove his point. He lambasted Joe for texting a woman photographs of himself shirtless while rearranging the junk in his trunk. Joe said nothing in response, but clearly he knew the attack was coming. His son, Joe Jr., showed up to defend his father. To the extent Maggie was mistreated, the son said, it was the fault of his mother. (Joe Sr. and his wife are divorced.) And if his father texted racy photos, the son said, it was to someone with whom his father had “a close personal relationship.” Shortly afterward, Joe Jr. grabbed the photos the Hot Dog Man gave the council and split. Hot Dog Man put up a hew and cry, demanding action. Councilmember Kathleen Reddington expressed concern about the public’s safety and demanded police protection. Joe, who had said nothing on the dais, exited the council chambers to be interviewed by a Kardashianesque TV reporter with very pointy shoes. Somehow, along the way, the dog photos were retrieved.
Among the many hats Joe wears is that of chairman of the board for Zona Seca — which means a place to “dry out” in Spanish. Zona Seca provides court-mandated rehab counseling for first-time DUI offenders. This being Joe’s second rollover, he’ll no longer be eligible for Zona Seca’s counseling. I get that alcoholism is a disease and relapse happens; if you shake my family tree, empty bottles will come raining down. But driving while drunk is not a disease; it’s a crime. When it comes to drunken-driving deaths, the United States is Number One. Our legal limit is much higher than other countries’, even those where drinking is the national pastime. Here, someone is killed by a drunken driver every 30 minutes. Here, drunken drivers will kill four times as many people as were wiped out on 9/11 every year, and twice the number of troops killed during almost a decade of fighting in Iraq. In Norway, first-time drunken drivers are sentenced to three weeks hard labor; multiple offenders lose their licenses forever. In Japan, the maximum penalty is three years with hard labor. In Saudi Arabia, offenders are taken out and publicly whipped. If it was up to me, repeat offenders would have their ankles broken and be made to crawl. Joe’s lucky. He’s looking at a year behind bars, but he’ll probably get an ankle bracelet instead. In the meantime, the worst the Carpinteria council can do is strip him of his committee assignments, vote to censure him, and formally ask him to resign. My bet is they’ll do all three two weeks from now. When that happens, I’ll hoist a beer, maybe three. But I’ll do what Joe should have: call a cab.
Comments
Well, the Bailiffs who will perp walk criminally convicted Joe out of Superior Court will have loaded guns as they are deputy Sheriffs.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
January 12, 2012 at 12:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Sounds like Joe Jr. committed theft in front of a room full of witnesses. Is there nothing this apparently criminally inclined family won't do to further their own interests, the rest of us be damned?
I'm sure the folks in Carp could launch a very successful recall campaign. After all, Armendariz has already said he will not seek re-election. give him the opportunity to make good on his word.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
January 12, 2012 at 9:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I suspect that Joe’s insistence on staying in office is not motivated so much by arrogance and hubris as it is by simple politics. If Joe leaves office, the City Council will be able to appoint someone to fill his spot. This appointee will then have a distinct incumbent advantage when election time rolls around. Considering the current political balance on the Carpinteria City Council, the chances that they would appoint a pro-oil development conservative are pretty slim. Consequently, Joe is going to hang on until the Republican machine can anoint (or at least press gang) a conservative candidate to accept all the big money donations and run. There’s black gold (Texas tea?) to be had by Venoco or its successors and assignees if the right councilmembers are in office. Joe is doing his duty to his conservative handlers and sticking it out until a viable candidate can be groomed to run.
Eckermann (anonymous profile)
January 12, 2012 at 4:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
one thing for sure- someone he respects needs to tell him to stop posting on Facebook- its public and such self-serving, arrogant, junior-high-ish ranting, about the public exercising their right to speak. amazing stuff for an elected official......and to invoke the image of someone bringing a loaded gun...just astounding.
sbsleuth99 (anonymous profile)
January 12, 2012 at 8:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Eck sums it up quite nicely, I believe. But it's a two-way street and a very disingenuous attempt to get rid of Joe because of his politics. (Not by Eck necessarily.) No doubt Joe can be arrogant and has really "stepped in it" himself this time, deserving the criticism. But it's a crock to claim that "oh we want Joe to step down so that he can get the help he needs" - "oh Joe is bringing negative attention to our fair city." Total BS. Just admit you don't like him or his politics and this is a great chance to try and push him out. And agree with him or not, he's still one of the more thoughtful members of the council. A couple of them that I won't mention can barely string together two meaningful sentences at the meetings. By the way, cops have made more than a visit or two in regards to one of the other council members. Where's all the concern for that troubled situation?
Scooter (anonymous profile)
January 12, 2012 at 8:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"...he's still one of the more thoughtful members of the council."
-- Scooter
Not based on the facts in evidence. Joe is an ideologue. He couldn't think his way out of a wet paper bag. Carp and the South Coast is better off now that he's neutered himself.
SezMe (anonymous profile)
January 13, 2012 at 1:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It's true Scooter and SezMe that Armendariz is "one of the more thoughtful members of the council." Unfortunately those thoughts are only of himself.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
January 13, 2012 at 10:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Loaded gun huh? Like that loaded gun he was trying to aim down the highway that night.
Typical of right sided politicians. They never step aside but demand the left side do so when they are found guilty of same crimes. My observations as a political atheist.
If I owned a firearm, I might have taken him up on his challenge. I'm sure there are plenty of gun owners contimplating the same right now.
spacey (anonymous profile)
January 13, 2012 at 1:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What ever happened to public shame and responsibility? More than one drunk driving conviction disqualifies you from a lot. It shows repeated abysmal judgment, which means you shouldn't be representing anyone. If you drink and drive, I, and every other responsible adult, get to hold you in contempt, and demand that you step down. You care more for your own amusement than for the lives of those in our community.
This is one of your best columns ever, Poodle. Armendariz, you should be ashamed of yourself, apologize, and step down.
Becky (anonymous profile)
January 14, 2012 at 6:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Is Grover Norquist driving these men to drink and drive? Don't forget Armendariz's attack on medical marijuana patients.
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012...
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
January 15, 2012 at 11:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@NickWelsh: While I'm not into breaking ankles, and I assume you were taking journalistic liberties, you're article is right on point and clearly makes the cause for Armendariz' removal.
@Ken_Volok: I have had four family members affected by drunk drivers, and none affected by pot smokers. I would add to your comment the arrant hypocrisy of the elected officials here in the Santa Ynez Valley who treat medical marijuana as the Great Corrupter of society while these same people tacitly approve the takeover of the wine bars and the drunks they attract.
When a hate crime is committed, (such as that where the two men were brutally beaten in Santa Barbara because they were gay) all the Usual Suspect come out of the woodwork and cry about how such crimes won't be tolerated. However, when someone is killed by a drunk driver, they continue their support of the alcohol industry as well as going along with the myth that "wine tasting" doesn't involve people getting drunk.
Lest I attract the usual ill-informed plethora of folks saying that I'm pro-prohibition, or that I'm a Loadie a la Fast Times At Ridgemont High, I'm neither. I merely dare to say that there is a connection between the plentiful number of DUI's and a society which *encourages" people to drink--knowing full well that these folks are getting behind the wheel afterward.
If you must get loaded, drunk, or whatever, take Nick's cue: Take a cab home.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
January 16, 2012 at 2:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)
You were brilliant in Easy Rider Bill.
But seriously, I can't help but think of 154 as a death trap, all those drunk/buzzed tourists coming home from the casino and wine tasting.
What's amazing to me is often times people know they will be drinking when they go out, yet they make no safe provision to get home before it's time to!
When people talk about "personal responsibility" that's the kind of thing I think of.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
January 16, 2012 at 8:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Gotta give "spacey" the brass ring here. Does anyone remember when a certain former left-enviro SB Councilman got nabbed by store security for switching price tags at a local housewares vendor, and the ensuing hue and cry from the "right" to tar and feather him on the rail he should be riding on his way out of the town he obviously never should have inhabited because of his grievous disregard of the laws he'd sworn to uphold and defend?
There is no partisan or ideological divide on foolish, antisocial, or criminal behavior, but there certainly is one where it comes to placing blame and taking responsibility.
GregMohr (anonymous profile)
January 16, 2012 at 12:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Greg Mohr, you are a little off here. Armandirez is a criminally negligent drunk driver, and hence a public menace.
Switching price tags? Really? That's like excusing your child for being a serial rapist, since the neighbor's kid looked at Hustler magazine.
The fact is, right-wing nut-jobs more often bash gays while they live in the closet, bash marijuana while they drive drunk, condemn marital infidelity while they have affairs, and take bribes while they preach fiscal responsibility. What are we supposed to think?
rambler (anonymous profile)
January 17, 2012 at 8:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
what can the public do to get him out? Isn't that the question here? how can the public start a recall, seems to me reading the paper, reading comments, listening to people in town, reading comments on social media that NO ONE basically wants him on the council, so let's just get him out, like my dad used to say, poop or get off the pot, stop bitching about him and take action! Can we get papers from city hall? I'll start them!
bashore18 (anonymous profile)
January 24, 2012 at 10:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)