In a special hearing late Tuesday afternoon, the Santa Barbara Unified School District Board officially got word that, when it comes to being expelled or suspended, or just plain skipping school, Latino students are at least twice as likely as their “white” counterparts to run into trouble. The news was the punch line, albeit an anticipated one, in a long-awaited district report on student discipline, itself the opening salvo to a larger and more significant effort led by new Superintendent David Cash to revamp the district’s discipline policies and potentially implement a restorative-justice program for kids who run afoul of certain school rules.
In fact, after more than two hours of discussing discipline, the details of who gets punished and why, and the ups and downs of restorative-justice techniques already in use at other districts with similar demographics, the board gave full support to Cash and set the stage to have a restorative-justice–based pilot program in place at one of S.B.’s junior high schools by the start of next school year. “The data we see suggests a definite lack of student engagement,” explained Cash, later adding, “We really need to do some important things, and we need to do them quickly, very quickly.”
After crunching numbers from the past three school years, the district found that when it comes to overall suspension numbers (i.e., combining students from elementary, junior high, and high schools, and adjusting ratios based on enrollment figures), Latino males were approximately three times as likely to be suspended than white males, and Latina females were roughly six times more likely to be suspended than white females. Overall expulsion numbers showed a ratio of two male Latino students kicked out for every one white male, and upward of four female Latinas getting the boot for every white female student.
The primary reason for expulsion for boys, at 31 percent, was an infraction related to controlled substances, while the number-one reason for suspension was disruptive or defiant behavior. On the female side of things, the overwhelming reason for expulsion and suspension was controlled substances. The report, which was compiled by Robin Sawaske, district associate superintendent, and Davis Hayden, director of research and evaluation, also revealed that when it comes to skipping school (something that happened 19,439 times last year at high schools alone), Latinos are roughly twice as likely to ditch.
Presented with the data, boardmembers all expressed their dismay, though none seemed too surprised. As Boardmember Annette Cordero put it, “We have now seen a lot of data that simply tells us what we already knew. … The real issue is why is this disparity occurring and what can we do about it? We need to look at what is happening and, perhaps, what is not happening [at the campus level].” After discussing this for a while and essentially ruling out institutionalized racism, the board identified certain contributing factors behind the numbers, like nonuniform truancy reporting protocols for schools, and the various “subjective” elements of the district’s current student discipline policies versus the “objective” ones. It was the latter that seemed to be a major point of concern for many of the boardmembers, as well as Superintendent Cash.
“Because our policies are loose [in the guidance they give to teachers], I think we have more subjectivity, and that’s a big problem. We need to minimize that and maximize the objectivity.” — Boardmember Monique Limón
With the district’s discipline matrix (which identifies various student infractions and outlines the appropriate response by teachers and administrators, such as send the student to the principal or call the cops) as evidence, Boardmember Monique Limón, who was touting the benefits of restorative justice during her race for the School Board two years ago, opined, “Because our policies are loose [in the guidance they give to teachers], I think we have more subjectivity, and that’s a big problem. We need to minimize that and maximize the objectivity.”
To that end, it seems that restorative justice — which essentially gives offending students an opportunity to repair the damage they might have caused by enrolling in counseling or some such rehabilitative effort that works to address the underlying cause of their misbehavior — could be quite helpful, or at least that is what Cash and the boardmembers are hoping for. Pointing to the program currently in place in the Denver Unified School District as a model, Cash made a pitch to the boardmembers to let him, with the help of teachers and students alike, flesh out in the coming months via a public workshop or two what exactly a similar restorative justice effort would look like here in Santa Barbara. If done right, Cash argued, such a program would not only work to reduce suspension/expulsion rates but would also improve overall campus culture and even help close achievement gaps. “It takes time, but when it happens, it is real change,” said Cash.
The efforts, however, would not be easy, acknowledged the superintendent, and they would certainly meet “significant resistance” both from within and outside the school community by folks who may not be up for overhauling the way the schools respond to kids who break fundamental rules or who see such restorative-justice efforts as being soft on crime. “The most important part is our teachers,” explained Cash. “They have to be interested and willing to make transformative changes in how they relate to their students.”
If all goes according to plan, Cash hopes to be back to the board by late February with the specific terms of a pilot program.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
I'm re-posting what I just posted on the Angry Poodle blog.
(part one of two)
(Part one of two)
.
Two countries side by side, one has a very high standard of living, the other a low standard of living. We know which countries I'm talking about so I'll dispense with the analogy. Mexico is a political dystopia of corruption, totalitarianism, and poverty, and is more than happy to get rid of its impoverished dark-skinned people. (It's also very racist--just look at the light-skinned people on its soap operas or in Spanish "telenovelas".)
Because of our proximity to Mexico, it's very easy for people to come in here; with the "push" factor of poverty down there, lots of people come here. The "pull" factor is the promise of jobs--however low-paying and degrading--that are offered up here by greedy employers who hate labor unions and safety codes. Add to this the generous benefits of "affordable housing" offered by our government. The "nudge-nudge-wink-wink" message of our politicians is "come in the right way but if you do walk in illegally then we won't throw you out if you're willing to put up with abuses that those pesky labor reformers worked so hard to do away with".
billclausen (anonymous profile)
January 19, 2012 at 4:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
(part two of two)
Add to this the fact that unlike every other ethnic group on the planet, Latinos/Hispanics/Mexican immigrants are encouraged not to acquire the main thing one needs to have to get ahead in ANY country: literacy. Everything is spoon-fed to them in Spanish by people who insist that any of us who dare to question this are "racist" while they themselves argue that unlike every other ethnic group on the planet, Latinos simply cannot be expected to overcome the language barrier. So begins the self-fulfilling prophecy of "la cadena perpetua" (the endless cycle) of low test scores, dropout rates, and criminal behavior. Anybody with two functioning brain cells knows that if you have low expectations of a child, the kid will have low self esteem. The parents face these same low expectations when they come to the U.S. and see everyone else learning English, while they are told by patronizing paternalistic people "no se ocupen, estamos aqui ayudarles" (don't worry, we're here to help you) So with parents who don't fit into the culture, the kids get a double-dose of low self esteem. Also, the paradox is that we are getting the least educated/poorest people of Mexico moving to the part of the country with the highest cost of living.
What is interesting is that people will say it's racist to not support bilingual services, yet often they themselves won't learn Spanish (or maybe a token few words to make themselves look like good compassionate Progressives) In other words, since they support a system which guarantees that many of these immigrants won't learn English, and they refuse to learn Spanish, they prove that in reality, they have no interest in truly getting to know the people they claim to represent.
The old civil rights movement wanted A: An integrated society, and B: A society where those of historically oppressed Demographics could achieve parity with the white race. Sadly, the apostate form of civil rights known as multiculturalism which is widely supported in the Democratic Party and the academic world ensures that neither of these things happen. As the saying goes "even the road to hell is paved with good intentions". The "civil rights" movement of today isn't the civil rights movement for which King sacrificed his life.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
January 19, 2012 at 4:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"After discussing this for a while and essentially ruling out institutionalized racism . . ."
Well, that was a handy bit of rationalizing.
It is exactly institutionalized racism.
Carlos666 (anonymous profile)
January 19, 2012 at 8:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Restorative justice? HAHAHA! Give me a break ese! Well, we now know what the new upcoming joke is gonna be. Thing is that it's gonna come back & bite them on the culo :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
January 20, 2012 at 12:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks bc and Hank.
The highest number of kids that cause problems are Latino so now it's Institutionalized Racism? Right...
This fabulous new experiment without scientific basis is another in a long list of wacky public policies.
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
January 21, 2012 at 9:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Crunch these numbers:
Take away all free social services of parents who do not endeavor control their kids. I guarantee those little mijos will be dressed and on time every day.
ramoncramon (anonymous profile)
January 24, 2012 at 8:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
As long as we treat anyone as an sub-class or don't integrate, you will get "sub-class" behavior. Happened during official segregation and is happening now. Many 1st generation folks are "from the bottom" and are forced out of their homes and come here for better opportunities. Whoopee? Even prison here is better for 'them'.
Legality or illegality is not the root cause. Behavior is. School's focus has to be on high expectations and integration. Nothing is wrong with culturally focused clubs, events, festivals, second language skills because we all came from somewhere. Integration needs to be centered around a common base language and values. Expect kids to make mistakes. And understand that Adjustment takes time. Expulsion puts people outside the system. So does treating a subculture as different. So hold kids and parents accountable for behavior. You cant treat attitudes; just behavior. One successful program I have seen was to make a parent attend school with their truant kid. (better than a cone of shame). We need literacy programs for both parents and kids. And classes to teach expected behaviors. (LA had to teach Asians not to race a yellow light).
passagerider (anonymous profile)
January 25, 2012 at 6:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The civil rights movement really was focused (correctly) on equal opportunity vice equality. Everyone is different which is what life so good. And life often is not fair or equal. Equal opportunity is making sure that institutional barriers and negative behaviors are minimized and then getting out of the way. Whether you take advantage of opportunities is your own choice. Everyone reaches different levels based more on their internal skills and talents if opportunities are equal. But people tend to blame external factors instead of internal factors.
passagerider (anonymous profile)
January 25, 2012 at 6:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Passagerider: While I cannot comment on the mention of Asians running yellow lights, I *will* say that your posts are excellent and right on target.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
January 26, 2012 at 3:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Bill: I lived in LA in the late 70's at a major multi-cultural school. LAPD went to the various Korean and Chinese churches. In the "old country", it was macho to race lights. "luckily" for the lapd, the Asians wanted to fit in so the lessons were easy. Very similar story to a whole of of "groups" before them. People will try to fit in if there is a benefit to them. Of course, i am guilty of broad stereotyping. :-(
If you want to live on the wild side, you need to drive in the Mideast where there are a lot of 1st generation drivers. China is MUCH wilder. It isn't a racial thing, its called inexperience mixed with showing off and not learning from your parents. to survive, you learn to swear in different languages.
passagerider (anonymous profile)
January 26, 2012 at 3:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Shokran, Zheh Zhen nay. ("Thank you" in Arabic and Mandarin)
billclausen (anonymous profile)
January 26, 2012 at 3:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)