Comments by truth_machine
Page 1 of 37 | Next
Posted on April 29 at 1:20 p.m.
The Hills clearly stated what is disingenuous about the flyers. For GoGauchos to then say "nothing I've found on the mailing was disingenuous" proves his own dishonesty ... and he goes further with "Information in the above article however...." without actually pointing out anything disingenuous in the Hills' article.
Posted on March 17 at 9:19 p.m.
"chrome molytube"
Some bad copy editing there.
Posted on January 26 at 8:28 a.m.
"the man involved in a serious physical altercation with police officer Aaron Tudor"
That's one way to describe having the crap beat out of him (and it wasn't just Tudor). The writing makes it seem, and seems intended to make it seem, as if Denunzio has a pattern of violence, when one of the cases was violence on him, not by him. (None of which is to in any way defend the violence he DID commit, just a point about the incompetent and unethical reporting.)
Posted on January 26 at 8:19 a.m.
People happy about this suicide or calling it cowardly are mentally ill.
Posted on March 15 at 8:47 p.m.
"Is Strickland any better?...I don't know" -- I'll bet that Bill Clausen *still* doesn't know anything about Tony Strickland, even after all the damage he's done to this state and is in the process of doing.
Posted on January 29 at 7:58 p.m.
John "the real one in spinning in his grave" Locke is, as usual, wrong on both facts and ethics. Here's a clue for the ever clueless-by-choice Mr. Faux-Locke: all the property rights here belong to First Bank, not Matt Osgood. And it's particularly amusing to see talk about in regard to an article that mentions "former corporate raider" Steve Posner. The "systematic violations" belong to such sociopaths who manipulate the system via legal and sometimes not-so-legal loopholes, corruption, bribery, and whatever else it takes, to skim riches from our society while many others are depending on more honest means while scraping to get by.
Posted on December 16 at 3:18 p.m.
Scooter, denying your bigotry doesn't make it any less apparent.
Posted on December 16 at 3:15 p.m.
It never would have worked, Bill; your intellectual dishonesty is a big turnoff for me.
Posted on December 16 at 3:09 p.m.
"forced to abandon his morals"
No one is "forced" to be immoral.
And EZK, it's not fair to pick on the mentally challenged.
Page 1 of 37 | Next
Previous Month
Posted on May 25 at 11:42 a.m.
Hannah-Beth Jackson is one of the best people on the planet. I can't imagine any decent person who actually knows her thinking that she is a bad person.
Y is heavily promoted by the developer to whom it gives public land, so that he can make oodles of profit from his 24 luxury homes. Why would sane person other than the developer himself be for this giveaway?
Yes on 28 & 29 ... look at fine print at the bottom of the No flyers, that say they received major funding from the tobacco companies. All the arguments against it are lies. Everyone concerned with preventing cancer rather than causing it is for 28 & 29.
On Endorsements: June 2012